Search Results
9988 results found with an empty search
Other Pages (3857)
- Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Film reviews from some of the biggest movies in UK cinemas. We also review short films, indie films, and documentaries. Find a movie review now. Film Reviews Here at UK Film Review we like to tackle all kinds film reviews. Our writers come from all walks of life, and feel passionate about critiquing the movies they watch. From the latest Theatrical Releases to Short Films, Indie Films, Documentaries and even Animation, the contributors of UK Film Review are as eager to please as Dev Patel in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011). If you are a filmmaker, or are working in film PR and want to promote one of your clients, please get in touch using the Submit Your Film button under the drop-down menu for Home. Take a look at our list of film reviews below from some of the hottest releases in UK cinemas. Simply click the image of the review you would like, or the title of the movie. Or use the search button to find the movie you are looking for. We have given any feature length film a star rating (out of 5) in order to help viewers sort the Citizen Kanes from the Waterworlds, the Inceptions from the Transformers. Michael Bay will be given a fair film review from our writers, but that probably will not go in his favour. Speaking of Filmmakers, head over to our Filmmaker Features page for awesome articles about some of the best filmmaking geniuses who ever lived. Movie Trailers are also available, either underneath the film reviews, or on the Movie Trailers page. And lastly, if you like your film reviews verbalised. Simply because reading is boring and listening is marvellous, then make sure you Subscribe to the UK Film Review Podcast. Our critics offer up some banterous opinions on the best and worst movies across all genres. Head over to the Podcast page, or click this link to go straight to iTunes. If you would like to read or view any of the following, simply use the navigation. Alternatively, you can click on one of the images to read the film reviews here, or simply have a ganders at the lovely movie artwork on display. Remember to listen to film reviews on our regular film podcast. GET REVIEWED average rating is 3 out of 5 Son of Sara Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 I Want Your Sex Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Nightborn Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Spider-Man: Brand New Day Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Remember Us Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Motor City Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The Dink Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Hadestown: The Musical Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The Odyssemen Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Andrea Alive Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The Summer Book Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 The Odyssey Read Review Spoilers in our film reviews As with all digital forms of expression sometimes people may find something that upsets them online. Spoilers can often be one of these things! Whilst we do our best to ensure that major plot points, twists, character deaths and celebrity cameos are not found in our reviews, it can sometimes be difficult to judge what each and every film lover on the planet would to be a spoiler. If you feel that one of our film reviews contains one too many details then please do let us (politely) know using our social media platforms. We may then take serious action, such as expelling the critic responsible from this and every other movie publication past and present, declaring war against the studio for leading our writer into temptation, or we may do nothing at all. To be honest, it is most likely going to be the latter unless some serious rules have been broken. You may also see some movie trailers in our reviews that could also contain potential spoilers. In which case anyone who is hoping to avoid these should probably not click the play button on them. Or click the play button, turn the sound down on your device, then leave the room for a least 28 minutes whilst the trailer finishes and leaves your life naturally. You may be wondering what you could do with all 28 of those minutes! Why not read some more film reviews on another device? Or make a short film of your cat playing with a piece of string? Spend it wisely guys and gals.
- Music Video Reviews | UK Film Review
Read music video reviews by film critics at UK Film Review. Submit your music video for review by clicking Get Reviewed at the top of the website. Music Video Reviews One of the most exciting sub-genres our critics review is music videos. They are often incredible pieces of storytelling, either in their own right or aligned with the song playing over them. On this page you will find a great selection of music video reviews from the team of critics at UK Film Review. If you are a filmmaker or artist who would like us to review your music video, submit your film here . When it comes to reviewing a music video, the process differs slightly from perhaps a narrative short film or documentary. The music has to be explored far more intimately than if it were a soundtrack because that's where the story originates from rather than being added further down the line. Music videos do conform to genres but these are often musical genres rather than film categories, for example pop, folk, rock, rap etc. So this will also influence the music video review our critics write because the target audience is going to be considered. Music videos may take a variety of forms or even combine different aspects to create a different effect on the viewer. For example, it is common for a music video to contain a small narrative, as well as live performance footage. Top filmmakers making music videos will be able to immerse you into the song and story without leaving you feeling like you have just watched a promo piece. Choreography is also a common trait in music videos, with dance sequences and flash mobs recurring - often in pop music videos. Editors of music videos will have their work cut out to ensure the choreography looks tight and engaging without it feeling staged or lifeless. Hopefully the array of music video reviews you see below will include some gems for you to peruse. Don't forget to scroll to the bottom of the article, as we often include the actual music video so you can watch it for yourself. It's Not Goodbye - December Fades Official Music Video Chris Buick Return to Elenore Matt Trapp TELEPROMPTER - Late Night Television Matt Trapp Lennington Evening-Blooming Cellar Jason Knight Ethereal Matt Trapp Blooming Cellar-Tuesday Jason Knight Train Ride Jason Knight An Ode To A Popstar William Hemingway Help Me Patrick Foley Bitter Cherry – Hunger Short Film Review alexjames96 Jun 3, 2025 2 min read Ain’t my Vibe Short Music Video Review alexjames96 Jun 6, 2024 2 min read Cinerama (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Mar 17, 2024 2 min read Homecoming (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Dec 19, 2023 2 min read Sheep F-cked In the Head Short Film Review alexjames96 Nov 16, 2023 2 min read Service for The King short film review Theo Aug 1, 2022 2 min read More Film Reviews
- Film Reviews and Movie Trailers | UK Film Review
Film reviews and movie trailers for new movies, indie cinema and short films.Read a film review or watch a trailer on our website. LATEST MOVIE REVIEWS UK Film Review is a film reviews website based in London, UK. We promote films and movie trailers from around the world and support indie films that would usually find it hard to find the spotlight against the bigger films of cinema. From the latest blockbusters, to small indie cinema, we tackle as many films as we can. Reviewing them from all aspects, not just how many digital landscapes they blow up using CGI. We also review short films in the UK and internationally, helping filmmakers to promote their movies and raise their profile. If you would like to have a short or indie film reviewed by us, please submit all info using the button below. Take a look around, enjoy the spoils of filmmaking, film festivals and artistic expression. Our merry band of film critics are constantly hard at work, writing film reviews, or watching movie trailers for some of the most exciting movies coming out in UK cinemas. So to keep their morale up, please be nice...or at least funny if you choose to troll. Because, in the immortal words of Rick Moranis in the movie Spaceballs, "Keep firing A**holes!". By the way, on this film reviews website, you may see several references to Spaceballs. If you have not seen that classic Mel Brooks film, you MUST seek it out and tell us what you think. SUBMIT YOUR FILM Are You a Film Podcast Fan? Film critics Chris Olson and Brian Penn host a monthly podcast for all types of film fans! Whether you like the latest blockbuster releases, or streaming is your thing - we have you covered. We even review short and independent films on the podcast. Our final review is usually for a "Nostalgia" pick - something from the past worth revisiting. Previous picks for this have included Jaws, The Fly, and Good Will Hunting. Search UK Film Review Podcast wherever you like to listen and join our global community of film lovers. Get Reviewed On Our Podcast Film Reviews from UK film critics LATEST REVIEWS Son of Sara average rating is 3 out of 5 AVALUDAN average rating is 4 out of 5 Questionable average rating is 3 out of 5 Bobby average rating is 2 out of 5 I Want Your Sex average rating is 4 out of 5 Dead Air average rating is 3 out of 5 Noblestone average rating is 4 out of 5 Nightborn average rating is 3 out of 5 Spider-Man: Brand New Day average rating is 4 out of 5 Beau Ideal average rating is 3 out of 5 Remember Us average rating is 3 out of 5 The Quiet Ocean average rating is 4 out of 5 Featured Film News FILM NEWS The Latest Film Trailers MOVIE TRAILERS Focker-in-Law Heart of the Beast Klara and the Sun Power Ballad The Debut One Night Only Filmmaker Interviews INTERVIEWS
Blog Posts (5294)
- What Film Critics Are Saying About Spider-Man: Brand New Day
Film Feature by Chris Olson There is a distinct, prickly sensation that washes over a film editor when the entire internet appears to be spinning a vast web of enthusiasm for a movie he has not yet had the privilege to watch. As someone who has unashamedly championed Tom Holland’s tenure as Peter Parker, from his wide-eyed debut in Civil War right through to the multiversal heartbreak of No Way Home, I am currently caught in a sticky situation. My calendar has conspired against me, keeping me glued to my desk while audiences and critics nationwide rush to cinemas to witness Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Living vicariously through the critical consensus is a dangerous game, but reading the early reviews has left my senses tingling in overdrive. By all accounts, director Destin Daniel Cretton’s takeover of the franchise has delivered a narrative that doesn't just swing for the fences; it hooks its webs onto the highest skyscraper in town and launches the character into a bold, emotionally fraught new era. Leading the charge in pushing my excitement to a fever pitch is our very own George Wolf at UK Film Review. In his glowing Spider-Man: Brand New Day film review, George awarded the picture a stellar 4-star review, marveling at how the story brilliantly handles the devastating aftermath of Doctor Strange’s memory-wiping spell. George pointed out that far from hitting the reset button as a mere gimmick, the narrative forces Peter to grapple with profound isolation. It turns out that living in a pokey New York apartment where nobody remembers your name makes for rich dramatic soil. George praised Holland for delivering his most grounded, layered performance to date, swinging effortlessly between world-weary grit and that trademark, relatable warmth that made us fall in love with his Spidey in the first place. Spider-Man: Brand New Day Final Movie Trailer George is far from a lone voice shouting into the void of the Daily Bugle’s newsroom. Across the aggregate landscape, the film is catching critics in a sticky trap of near-unanimous acclaim. Over on Rotten Tomatoes, the film debuted to a dazzling score up in the nineties, placing it firmly alongside the most revered superhero chapters of modern cinema. Sifting through the verified reviews, a clear trend emerges: reviewers are praising this fourth installment for daring to strip away the grand, multiversal spectacle of its predecessor in favour of a more tactile, character-driven story. Industry commentators on platforms like Collider and Esquire have highlighted the film's surprising tonal shift. While the previous trilogy bathed in the bright, energetic glow of high school comedies, Brand New Day plunges Peter into the gritty, unforgiving reality of young adulthood. The integration of street-level Marvel elements, most notably Jon Bernthal’s brooding Punisher, has been singled out as a masterstroke, creating a tense, ideological friction that challenges Peter’s moral compass like never before. Over on IMDb, where early audience scores and user reviews are flooding in, the sentiment is equally charged. Viewers are raving about the stunning sequence work and practical stunt craft. Film critics across social media have noted that Cretton trades in heavy, weightless CGI for punchy, grounded fights across rainy Manhattan rooftops, giving every punch and web-slinging leap a bone-crunching sense of impact. There is also endless chatter surrounding Sadie Sink’s mysterious role, with reviewers teasing that her performance introduces an intriguing, unpredictable dynamic that keeps the audience guessing throughout. Yet, for all the talk of practical action and gritty combat, what truly resonates across the critical landscape is the enduring heart of Holland’s performance. Tom Holland Talks Spider-Man: Brand New Day Many critics have remarked that despite the suit, the villains, and the high-stakes heroics, the core of the film remains a deeply human drama about grief, independence, and the heavy price of duty. The bittersweet dynamic between Peter and Zendaya's MJ, who now looks at him as a complete stranger, is reportedly handled with such delicate, romantic-comedy flair and tragic undertones that more than a few hardened film writers have admitted to shedding tears. Naturally, a few contrarians have grumbled that the film spends a little too much time marinating in Peter’s existential angst rather than offering wall-to-wall superhero brawling. But frankly, that only increases my appetite. I have always maintained that the best Spider-Man stories are the ones where Peter Parker’s personal life is falling apart just as fast as he can web it together. With great reviews, however, comes great responsibility, chiefly, the responsibility to clear my diary, buy an oversized tub of popcorn, and get myself into a cinema seat at the earliest possible opportunity. If the film critics are to be believed, Tom Holland has not only proved that there is plenty of life left in the old web-shooter, but he has also delivered a spectacular, triumphant chapter that redefines what a Marvel movie can be. Now, if you will excuse me, I'm off to fight my way through ticket queues before the entire plot is spoiled for me.
- What Happened to Suzie? Film Review
Star rating: 4/5 Writer: James Ersted and David R. Larson Director: James Ersted Starring: Dylan Nunez, Paul Parducci, Kira Omans, Ari Hader and Alain Mora. What Happened to Suzie? is an absorbing thriller. Written by James Ersted and David R. Larson, and directed by James Ersted, this film is composed as a documentary, in the style of a 'mockumentary', but with a twist, and 100% in the dramatic genre. We meet Andy, played by Dylan Nunez, whose sister Suzie disappeared without a trait years before. He is collaborating with a documentary crew to tell his story. They organically build trust and get deeper into the story, including the fact of close family always being suspected first in disappearance cases. Unbeknownst to Andy, Don (Paul Parducci), who as director and main cameraman is the leader of the film crew, is already aware his uncle was the main suspect for a long time- when he tells Andy, alarm bells start ringing, but, after some strong hesitation, Andy ultimately decides to go through with and even deepen the collaboration, and get to the truth of what happened, with grave consequences. Technically, this film is brilliant. Visually it is gripping, with adept use of a huge variety of points of view, including CCTV footage, screen view of online calls and chats, and unique views from corner windows. The performances are brilliant, with the actors’ naturalism shines through- not an easy feat when playing high tension situations. The theme of empathy runs all the way through this film- the documentary crew, with the exception of Cynthia (played brilliantly by Kira Omans) shows no emotional interest in Andy's situation. Don even tells him that whatever Andy gets filmed doing, to add to the piece, 'doesn't have to be real, it just needs look that way for the camera'. A big question here is who can we ever really trust with our stories, pain and problems. That's the difference between being supported, or these spiralling out of control. The ultimate theme, however, is the power of organised crime, and the destructive effects it has on people, families and even entire communities. Can we ever really combat it?
- Everything We Know About Johnny Depp's Ebeneezer Movie
Film Feature By Chris Olson There are certain literary treasures so pure, so thoroughly perfected across decades of adaptation, that any attempt to dismantle and reconstruct them ought to come with a health warning. Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol is chief among them. For generations, readers and filmgoers alike have held up various screen incarnations of the infamous Victorian miser as gold standards of holiday storytelling. Alastair Sim captured the ghost-riddled guilt with haunting authenticity in 1951, while Albert Finney brought musical flair to the Victorian gloom in 1970. Yet, for my money, and I suspect for many who cherish true cinematic perfection, no actor has ever matched the towering, deadpan brilliance of Sir Michael Caine in 1992’s The Muppet Christmas Carol. Playing it entirely straight opposite a felt frog and a blue whatever-he-is, Caine delivered a masterclass in emotional arc, vulnerability, and genuine redemption. You believed his heart was breaking; you believed his joy when he bought the prize turkey. So, when news reached my desk at UK Film Review that Paramount Pictures had mounted a brand-new, horror-infused reinterpretation entitled Ebenezer, starring none other than Johnny Depp as the titular humbug, my initial reaction was not excitement. It was a cold, creeping sense of dread. Ahead of its scheduled November release, I must judge what we know so far based on trailers, casting announcements, and studio fanfare. And frankly, as someone who holds the classic adaptations near and dear, I am pessimistic. Ebeneezer Official Film Trailer Directed by Ti West, the indie horror filmmaker behind X, Pearl, and MaXXXine, this new iteration promises a decidedly gothic, supernatural take on the 1843 novella. From the footage unveiled in the recent trailer release, West is leaning heavily into jump scares, bleak snowscapes, and stylized terror. The film positions itself as a darker origin-adjacent study of how Ebenezer became the cold-hearted miser who despises humanity, complete with harrowing ghostly encounters that look more suited to an October horror marathon than a cozy December evening by the fire. While horror and Dickens have always shared common roots, Dickens did, after all, write ghost stories; there is a fine line between chilling atmospheric tension and overwrought grimness. When a story shifts its focus entirely toward macabre spectacle, it risks losing the essential warmth and moral resurrection that gives A Christmas Carol its enduring soul. Michael Caine didn't need blood-curdling frights to convey a soul in torment; a subtle tremble of his lip and a tear in his eye did the work of a thousand jump scares. On paper, the supporting ensemble for Ebenezer is undeniably impressive. Sir Ian McKellen steps into the heavy chains of Jacob Marley, while Andrea Riseborough portrays the Ghost of Christmas Past. Tramell Tillman takes on the Ghost of Christmas Present, Daisy Ridley appears as the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come, and Rupert Grint plays the long-suffering Bob Cratchit. However, all eyes are inevitably fixed on Johnny Depp. The project marks his first major Hollywood studio production in eight years, framing the film as a high-stakes comeback vehicle. We have seen Depp construct iconic, larger-than-life characters over the decades, from Edward Scissorhands to Captain Jack Sparrow. But in recent times, his performance style has often tilted toward eccentric caricature rather than grounded dramatic truth. During a recent promo stunt at San Diego Comic-Con, Depp appeared in full Victorian costume, scowling at attendees and barking in character. It was classic circus showmanship, but it did little to assuage my fears that this performance might end up as another parade of exaggerated accents, prosthetics, and theatrical tics. Scrooge requires a subtle heart underneath the frost. If Depp treats the role as merely another quirky creature in his gallery of misfits, the central emotional core of the narrative will simply collapse. The challenge with remaking a legend is that you are constantly standing in the shadow of giants. When Caine sang alongside Kermit and Gonzo, he treated the material with absolute sincerity, grounding a fantastical world in real, human heartbreak. By contrast, a heavy-handed, horror-adjacent blockbuster risks feeling hollow; a stylish exercise in gothic aesthetic that forgets why people fall in love with Dickens’s tale every winter. I hope Ti West and Johnny Depp will prove me wrong when Ebenezer finally arrives in cinemas this November. Perhaps the gloom will give way to a genuinely moving story of redemption. But until the lights go down and the credits roll, I remain deeply sceptical. For now, I suspect I shall be sticking with Tiny Tim, Rizzo the Rat, and Sir Michael Caine.
Forum Posts (804)
- “YOUR MOVE” - REVIEW: Over the Edge, Into the DarknessIn Film Reviews·January 27, 2018There is an apocryphal saying - variously attributed to Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Mark Twain and a host of others - that there are only two stories we tell each other in our literature, our movies, our narrative arts. In the first, a person goes on a journey; in the second, a stranger comes to town. What matters is not which of these stories an artist chooses, but how it’s told, and how it illuminates another corner of the human soul, be it dark or light. With “Your Move” actor/director/writer Luke Goss effectively combines the two in the person of his protagonist, who must go on a journey to save what he loves most in the world, becoming a stranger in the dark underworld of a Mexican town where clues and danger are virtually indistinguishable. Goss - up to now known as an actor’s actor and platinum-selling musician - proves highly adept at this newest iteration of his abilities, guiding what in other hands might be a standard genre story forward with skill and subtlety. By keeping the focus on the inner workings of his characters Goss creates as much nerve-wracking tension with a quiet tableau between two people as he does with an all-out chase scene. Goss plays New York businessman David Miller, a man with a good life and a family he adores. While on a video call with his wife Isabel (Patricia De Leon) and young daughter Savannah (Laura Martin), who are in Mexico visiting Isabel’s parents, David - back home in New York - witnesses a brutal attack on them that ends in an apparent kidnapping. Stuck thousands of miles away and not knowing where to turn, David calls the local NYPD, whose skeptical response only makes him realize how dire his family’s situation actually is. As an actor Goss is deeply likable, exceptionally effective at translating what his characters are feeling, and the terror David experiences at not knowing what has happened to his loved ones is brutal and palpable. In Mexico he meets the cop in charge of the case, Detective Romero (the superb Robert Davi, in a richly nuanced performance). David wants answers, action, anything to make him feel that progress is being made. Romero, a good detective, understands the need to build his case on facts, and while Romero feels for David’s plight, the man is also his worst nightmare - an uncontrolled wild card who could blow the case at a moment’s notice by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Romero’s careful, low-key approach to the investigation seems like dangerous and deadly plodding from David’s point of view, sure to get his wife and daughter killed. On the other side of the coin is Isabel’s father, Señor Barrabas, a wealthy patrón of weight and gravity. Luis Gatica plays Barrabas with a quiet intensity that is at once civilized and menacing. Though he treats David and the detective as equals, he appears to engender fear and respect everywhere else. Accompanied at all times by a suited, hulking - and likely armed - bodyguard, who Goss subtley keeps just at the edge of the frame, Barrabas’ business dealings can only be guessed at. When it appears that he agrees with Romero’s method of handling the case, David panicks and takes matters into his own hands. Though fit and athletic, David has no “special set of skills” with which to make the bad guy’s life hell a’la the uber-hero in “Taken”, relying instead on instinct and sheer persistence, driven by the certain terror that if he doesn’t use every means at his disposal to track his family down, he will never see them again. Agonizing every step of the way over what he must become to get the job done, he isolates himself from both family and the authorities and relies instead on his gut. Goss’s abilities as a visual stylist and storyteller are well-matched to his subject matter and the camerawork is assured, but he doesn’t sacrifice character development for the sake of style. Goss - who also wrote the script - keeps the dialogue spare and measured, making wonderful use of the players’ inner lives to push the narrative and generate emotion. The acting is uniformly superb and the casting and directing are spot-on, with a touching and almost Fellini-esque sensibility, making scenes with even the most secondary characters satisfying and rewarding. The landscape of the human face as a map of the psyche clearly fascinates Goss at the deepest levels, and his painterly use of color, light and shadow add to the suspense and the unfolding story, while allowing the audience their own visual and emotional journey. And though the church is never explicitly mentioned there is a strain of lush religious iconography running through the film, implying religion as a particularly horrifying form of self-justification for the antagonist, played by Alain Mora in a performance that is a revelatory and disturbing portrayal of a man with a terrifying split in his psyche. The film may be billed as a psychological thriller, but the execution and performances defy simple genre categorization. It would appear that “Your Move” marks the auspicious start of yet another successful branch of Goss’s multi-hyphenate career. “Your Move” has its UK premiere on January 27, 2017. Watch the trailer, here: Writer: Kely Lyons - Los Angeles - January 27, 2018361967
- "Crazy Right" movie trailerIn Movie Trailers·March 5, 201824186
- Beauty and the Beast (2017) ReviewIn Film Reviews·November 1, 2017Disney is back with another live-action adaptation of one of their animated films. This time it was up to Beauty and the Beast to be remade and please the audience. But if we look at the final product that the film is, it seems to be that Disney did it more for the money than for the audience. Will the audience end up roaring for the new film or will it just be Disney happily roaring their victory over their audience? I think we all know the answer to that question. Beauty and the Beast is directed by Bill Condon and tells the tale of Belle. Belle (Emma Watson) is a young adult, who loves to read books and dreaming of playing a part in the adventures that are depicted on those pages. But when she leaves her small village to find her missing father (Kevin Kline), she encounters a large castle in which lives a horrifying Beast (Dan Stevens). As Belle stays with the Beast, she learns that true beauty is found within. Right from the beginning, the film wants to make very clear what kind of a jerk the Beast was before he came a Beast. Just like in the original animated film, where they spend a short monologue on the case. However, in this live-action adaptation they take more then a few minutes to make it clear that the Beast is a jerk. The problem is not that it is not well done, because making the Beast look arrogant is something the movie does is quite well, but the problem is that right from the beginning one of our main characters is an unlikeable prick, which creates a situation wherein you cannot root for the Beast to become normal again. You want him to stay a Beast, because that’s what he honestly deserves to be. He acts like a Beast for the first two acts of the movie. Then the filmmakers remembered that the Beast also must become a human at the end, so they quickly shoved moments in the movie trying to make the Beast look less like a prick and more like an misunderstood young adult. In the original animated film, the Beast had a compelling arc. In this film he does have an arc, but it’s not compelling because the Beast is arrogant throughout most of the film and acts like a prick to everyone around him. The arc is also rushed to the point that it makes you care even less for the Beast. Do you want examples of how much of a prick the Beast is? Well, the Beast doesn’t even give Belle a minute to say goodbye to her father, the Beast keeps correcting and interrupting Belle, the Beast wouldn’t give Belle a room, the Beast forces Belle to eat with him and lets her starve when she says she won’t eat with him etc. The thing with this movie is that they like to exaggerate everything the original did, to the point that this movie feels more like a dark cartoon then the original did.The scriptwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos also try to add new story elements to the script. There is a new back-story how both Belle and the Beast lost their mothers and it adds nothing new to the story. The scriptwriters probably did this trying to make the Beast, after first writing him as such an unlikable character, look more sympathetic and to give Belle an arc. Only thing is that the new back-story doesn’t make Beast look more sympathetic, he still comes across, as a bitter young adult and Belle never gets a conclusion to her arc. Her mother died when she was just a baby. Belle never knew her mother and this has had a great impact on her. However when she finally finds out, what happened to her mother, the subplot is quickly moved aside to continue the main story. Her arc is never resolved or even started to be honest. It just a waste of time. The script also tries to give Belle more personality. They did this by making her amazing in everything. She is good in reading, good with children, good in teaching, good in inventing, good in drawing, good in taming wild beasts (get it?). However, as expected, being good in everything doesn’t count as a trademark for a character. She isn’t Leonardo Da Vinci. Belle is a dreamer, who gets inspired by the books she reads. Belle is intellectual. Indeed. But in this movie they exaggerated her intelligence to the point that this Belle feels more like a cartoon character then her animated counterpart. There are also some continuity errors. Belle on Phillipe, the horse, move like the Flash when needed. Belle just arrives shortly after the villagers arrive at the castle, while the villagers had a big head start. The sound effects are also sometimes off in the final battle. Oh right, forgot. To please the immature and the children, the movie also includes butt and poop jokes. Yeah! There is also a mystery subplot for the character Agathe, which turns out to be the witch that cursed the Beast. This is so poorly done and unnecessary. She just comes and goes when the story needs her to come an go. And her importance to the story is never explained. Which leaves another unsolved subplot.The CGI in this film is, in contrary to the beautiful The Jungle Book, more creepy than fantasy provoking. Nobody wants to see a CGI teapot smiling. They created some nice nightmare related visuals for the younger kids. Can’t wait to see this on a childhood trauma list.Not everything is bad though. The acting is on point. Especially Gaston is likeable, which feels weird because he’s supposed to be villain of the film. Well don’t worry, because for this first half of the film Gaston comes across as a normal, somewhat dimwitted, individual, but in the second half, he leaves Maurice for the wolves stuck at a tree. Something the animated Gaston would probably also be able to do. The Gaston song is also very amusing. Their is actually an illiterate joke in their that works. The song also contains one exciting, maybe little expectable, but still amusing shot. In the end, Beauty and the Beast, is another Disney remake that is poorly executed and is solely done for the money. This movie in particular felt more like a cash grab than the other Disney movies. That is probably because the effect of the original is still untouched by other Disney movies. It is the only animated movie to be nominated for best picture. It is one of the most well known Disney movies. These were the reasons for which Disney thought that their live-action version could earn some big money. Sadly, it did. Overall, it’s not a complete failure. There are some genuine emotional moments. Some new interesting ideas, that all don’t workout however. And sometimes a joke works. But in the end, the movie is still pretty bad, mostly thanks to the poor script.15182
.png)









