Search Results
9661 results found with an empty search
Other Pages (3577)
- Music Video Reviews | UK Film Review
Read music video reviews by film critics at UK Film Review. Submit your music video for review by clicking Get Reviewed at the top of the website. Music Video Reviews One of the most exciting sub-genres our critics review is music videos. They are often incredible pieces of storytelling, either in their own right or aligned with the song playing over them. On this page you will find a great selection of music video reviews from the team of critics at UK Film Review. If you are a filmmaker or artist who would like us to review your music video, submit your film here . When it comes to reviewing a music video, the process differs slightly from perhaps a narrative short film or documentary. The music has to be explored far more intimately than if it were a soundtrack because that's where the story originates from rather than being added further down the line. Music videos do conform to genres but these are often musical genres rather than film categories, for example pop, folk, rock, rap etc. So this will also influence the music video review our critics write because the target audience is going to be considered. Music videos may take a variety of forms or even combine different aspects to create a different effect on the viewer. For example, it is common for a music video to contain a small narrative, as well as live performance footage. Top filmmakers making music videos will be able to immerse you into the song and story without leaving you feeling like you have just watched a promo piece. Choreography is also a common trait in music videos, with dance sequences and flash mobs recurring - often in pop music videos. Editors of music videos will have their work cut out to ensure the choreography looks tight and engaging without it feeling staged or lifeless. Hopefully the array of music video reviews you see below will include some gems for you to peruse. Don't forget to scroll to the bottom of the article, as we often include the actual music video so you can watch it for yourself. RAUNCHADELIC Matt Trapp CATACLYSM William Curzon Psiblingz - Till We're Found William Curzon Mammoth: Adventures In Gnomeman's Land William Hemingway Flesh Wanting Blood William Hemingway Lovin' You James Learoyd To Be Frank Chris Olson The Wanderer Matt Trapp The Sanctity of Faith Patrick Foley Bitter Cherry – Hunger Short Film Review alexjames96 Jun 3, 2025 2 min read Ain’t my Vibe Short Music Video Review alexjames96 Jun 6, 2024 2 min read Cinerama (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Mar 17, 2024 2 min read Homecoming (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Dec 19, 2023 2 min read Sheep F-cked In the Head Short Film Review alexjames96 Nov 16, 2023 2 min read Service for The King short film review Theo Aug 1, 2022 2 min read More Film Reviews
- The Bride! Review | Film Reviews
The Bride! film review by UK film critic Hope Madden. Starring Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Annette Bening directed by Maggie Gyllenhaal. HOME | FILMS | REVIEWS The Bride! Film Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Critic: Hope Madden | Posted on: Mar 4, 2026 Directed by: Maggie Gyllenhaal Written by: Maggie Gyllenhaal Starring: Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Annette Bening One part Metropolis , one part Bonnie & Clyde, just a touch of Bride of Frankenstein and yet somehow entirely writer/director Maggie Gyllenhaal’s own, The Bride! deserves that exclamation point. Jessie Buckley is a force of nature in a dual role—sort of a triple role, really: an unhappy Chicago gangster’s moll; Mary Shelley, silenced far too soon; and a monster, chaotic, unruly, unburdened by memory and guided by peculiar fury. The likeliest lock for Oscar in the 2026 race for her breathtaking turn in Hamnet , Buckley is perfectly paired with Christian Bale (that hack!), a unique image of Frankenstein’s monster. He is tender, lonesome, adoring, and very anxious. Frank has a serious anxiety issue, which is mainly calmed by watching his favorite movie star, the song and dance man Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal). To watch Buckley and Bale, two masters of their craft, work off each other is a treat, each of them tearing through Gyllenhaal’s inspired and intelligent script with dark joy. The leads are surrounded with memorable, noir-esque characters: Annette Bening as our mad scientist, Peter Sarsgaard as the gumshoe with some secrets, Penélope Cruz as the brains behind the investigation, John Magaro as the spineless gangster. Great as they are, and they all are, the star here is Maggie Gyllenhaal. Her tale is hyperliterate with surreal flourishes, dazzlingly filmed, constantly surprising and yet charmingly inevitable, and fueled by a glorious, contagious rage. There are dance sequences (an absolute blast) and shoot outs, a deep vein of dark humor, opportunities for redemption, and delightful easter eggs. (Ida’s nemesis is a gangster named Lupino; silver screen star Ida Lupino turned to directing, and one of her most cynical and impressive efforts was a 1963 episode of the TV show Thriller called “The Bride Who Died Twice.”) The Bride! delights with an anarchic energy, but its underlying plot is tight, its characters clearly drawn and beautifully performed, and its aesthetic wondrous. In just her second feature, after 2021’s sublime The Lost Daughter , Gyllenhaal’s cemented her spot as one of the most exciting filmmakers working. About the Film Critic Hope Madden Theatrical Release < All Reviews Next Film Review >
- Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Film reviews from some of the biggest movies in UK cinemas. We also review short films, indie films, and documentaries. Find a movie review now. Film Reviews Here at UK Film Review we like to tackle all kinds film reviews. Our writers come from all walks of life, and feel passionate about critiquing the movies they watch. From the latest Theatrical Releases to Short Films, Indie Films, Documentaries and even Animation, the contributors of UK Film Review are as eager to please as Dev Patel in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011). If you are a filmmaker, or are working in film PR and want to promote one of your clients, please get in touch using the Submit Your Film button under the drop-down menu for Home. Take a look at our list of film reviews below from some of the hottest releases in UK cinemas. Simply click the image of the review you would like, or the title of the movie. Or use the search button to find the movie you are looking for. We have given any feature length film a star rating (out of 5) in order to help viewers sort the Citizen Kanes from the Waterworlds, the Inceptions from the Transformers. Michael Bay will be given a fair film review from our writers, but that probably will not go in his favour. Speaking of Filmmakers, head over to our Filmmaker Features page for awesome articles about some of the best filmmaking geniuses who ever lived. Movie Trailers are also available, either underneath the film reviews, or on the Movie Trailers page. And lastly, if you like your film reviews verbalised. Simply because reading is boring and listening is marvellous, then make sure you Subscribe to the UK Film Review Podcast. Our critics offer up some banterous opinions on the best and worst movies across all genres. Head over to the Podcast page, or click this link to go straight to iTunes. If you would like to read or view any of the following, simply use the navigation. Alternatively, you can click on one of the images to read the film reviews here, or simply have a ganders at the lovely movie artwork on display. Remember to listen to film reviews on our regular film podcast. GET REVIEWED average rating is 4 out of 5 The Bride! Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Billy Idol Should Be Dead Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Hoppers Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Drowned Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Scream 7 Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Dreams Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Crazy Old Lady Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The President's Cake Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Fight Like A Girl Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Dolly Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Disremember Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Crime 101 Read Review Spoilers in our film reviews As with all digital forms of expression sometimes people may find something that upsets them online. Spoilers can often be one of these things! Whilst we do our best to ensure that major plot points, twists, character deaths and celebrity cameos are not found in our reviews, it can sometimes be difficult to judge what each and every film lover on the planet would to be a spoiler. If you feel that one of our film reviews contains one too many details then please do let us (politely) know using our social media platforms. We may then take serious action, such as expelling the critic responsible from this and every other movie publication past and present, declaring war against the studio for leading our writer into temptation, or we may do nothing at all. To be honest, it is most likely going to be the latter unless some serious rules have been broken. You may also see some movie trailers in our reviews that could also contain potential spoilers. In which case anyone who is hoping to avoid these should probably not click the play button on them. Or click the play button, turn the sound down on your device, then leave the room for a least 28 minutes whilst the trailer finishes and leaves your life naturally. You may be wondering what you could do with all 28 of those minutes! Why not read some more film reviews on another device? Or make a short film of your cat playing with a piece of string? Spend it wisely guys and gals.
Blog Posts (5247)
- Jua Film Review
Star rating: 5/5 Writer: Abdallah Ebbo Director: Abdalla Ebbo Starring: Aidalyne Jua is a bright piece of filmic poetry. Created by Abdallah Ebbo, Jua is an extremely short film which in its 2-minute duration warms up your day. Even from its title, which means Sun in Swahili (the ancient African language of some communities in what is today Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique), this audiovisual poem is an expression of strength and radiance. A compliment by a stranger can really change one’s day, but it can also make you realise if you’re dependent on external validation. Jua expresses the importance of self-worth, and the core of validation coming from oneself. This is a beautiful outlook on life, one which I would find deeply interesting to temper with the follow up question on how far can self-worth go in today’s world where broken communication and fractured relationships are increasingly the norm, where more and more people struggle to nurture relationships which are, whatever our individual state, what help us, as humans, make sense of ourselves and the world. Visually, Jua manages to express the warmth which it is about in black and white. The creative decision to film in black and white on a sunny day in an inner London high street is sumptuous, inspired. This dream-like texture is further enriched by the brilliant score, which sits somewhere between the soul and electronic genres. The performance by Aidalyne paints a brilliant picture where strength and vulnerability can be seen as two sides of the same coin. Jua is a fascinating concept to watch while in the crossroads of a society that increasingly prices the individual and talks about self-worth while battling the social and communal that inevitably plays a role in maintaining that very self-worth we speak about. Artistry like this is exactly what we need in our spiritual and even political mission to return to a balance that works for us both as free individuals and a society.
- Obex (2026) Movie Review
Directed by: Albert Birney Written by: Albert Birney Starring: Albert Birney, Callie Hernandez, Frank Mosley Film Review by: Holly Baker ⭐⭐⭐⭐ OBEX (2026) is an artistic, black-and-white surrealist film following Conor, a solitary man who lives with his dog, Sandy. Conor discovers a video game that will provide him with an adventure and a purpose, with this comes chaos and enlightenment. The film establishes its style with European-esque long, still camera takes, skilful use of silence, and simplicity in its mise en scene. Most of the film is set within Conor’s home as audiences are slowly invited into his mind and the inner workings of his life, particularly in the creative way that technology is incorporated. There is a subtle tone of sadness and desire throughout the first act, viewers get the sense that Conor is longing for a sense of freedom, conveyed through his artistic use of old-school computer technology to create images. Albert Birney, who directed and wrote OBEX , as well as starring as Conor, masterfully expresses attachment to familiarity as well as his desire for something more. Conor is unusual, seen in his strange visions, obsessions with bugs and technology, as well as his apparent inability to interact with other humans. His interactions with his impressively animated life companion- and dog- Sandy, are well established to communicate a sense of unconventional domestic routine that they are both fully conformed to and content in. OBEX ’s ominous tone, combined with surreal confusion, works in a very similar fashion to Richard Kelly’s Donnie Darko (2001). Fans of Jake Gyllenhaal’s character Donnie will relish in Conor’s similarity to him; his disinterest in conforming to everyday normality, his finding comfort in the strange, and intrigue in the bewildering. OBEX also follows a similar structure to Donnie Darko, as when Conor enters the OBEX game, just as Donnie enters the alternate universe, he is tasked with a mission that only he is able to understand and complete, and viewers, just like Conor, are never quite sure what is real. There is a satanic horror in OBEX, which is highly effective, with several incorporations of the devil figure, which are unnerving. The film leans heavily on a Lynchian weirdness and a sense of a lingering threat, which lures viewers in, allowing many interpretations to come to light. There are many great allegories to be found here, such as the dangers of technology, as well as mental health struggles. The theme of humanity becoming a slave to the screen in order to escape the disastrous reality we live in is highly perceivable, the film certainly goes further than this, expressing a sense of derealisation for Conor, which the viewer feels thoroughly. Obex Official Film Trailer An apt comparison could be David Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983), for its sensual strangeness and ability to bring to life the virtual world and strong use of editing and special effects. As well as this, there are notes of similarity to I Saw The TV Glow (2024) for both films use the world of media as a means of escape and as a search for meaning and identity, as well as a realm that is full of loss, but in this crucial experience. There is a heartfelt sentiment to end this surreal piece, as what starts as an adventurous quest for the curious Conor becomes an opening to a world full of sensations he seemed to lack in his previously mundane life. The film’s incorporation of normality through simple realism, combined with an escalation into devilish fantasy, results in a softly apocalyptic feel, and an excellent cinematic experience that viewers will immerse themselves in as they attempt to seek meaning. The film’s consistent eerie feel pays off with a deepening mystery and stylistic horror, with a dark, yet adoring tone. OBEX will have its UK Premiere at Glasgow Film Festival on Monday 2nd March and will be available on Digital from 9th March.
- Film Review: God of Frogs (2026)
Directed by: Adrian Bobb, Ali Chappell Written by: Adrian Bobb, Matthew Campagna, Ali Chappell Starring: Kate Vernon, Alexander Eling, Erika Prevost Film Review by: Holly Baker ★★ God of Frogs (2026) directed by Adrian Bobb and Ali Chappell, is a science fiction horror film surrounding a mythological Frog God. Starring Kate Vernon, Alexander Eling, and Erika Prevost, the film’s bizarre concept is followed by student filmmakers who have discovered the potential existence of the creature and decide to investigate it themselves. Consequently, the students appear to have bitten off more than they can chew, and the myth of the God of Frogs, which they had previously laughed off mockingly, causes carnage to their lives in several grim ways. The God of Frogs concept is initially engaging, particularly through the initial reveal of the creature in the first act of the film, which takes place about 100 years ago. During this sequence, viewers will be stunned by the symbolism and imagery surrounding the presentation of the creature. The God Of Frogs is predatory in a viscerally uncomfortable way, including a graphic sequence comparable to the intimate scenes in the masterful Possession (1981), directed by Andrzej Żuławski, through its practical effects, attention to detail, and ability to create a discomfort which resonates with viewers deeply and memorably/ The performances in the first act are praisable, the main cult leader ‘Guru’ character in particular, played by James Gilbert, known for his role in Saw VI (2009), is convincingly menacing in that slimy, predatory way so important as his character acts as a parallel to the ruthless creature. As the story moves to the present day, however, that Antichrist, gothic feel of the film is lost and replaced by a cheesy slasher tone as viewers endure quite shallow teenage characters' attempt to hopelessly defeat the Frog creature. The lack of substance in the latter half is partly made up for with the film’s creative style. As mentioned, the commitment to practical effects certainly pays off as the creature is genuinely grim, and viewers will be transfixed by its strange, unique form. As well as this, the film effectively uses lighting to create a psychedelic feel, enhancing the disorientation of the film's fantastical moments. The film also blends found footage style with orthodox camera work, a nice callback to The Blair Witch Project (1999), directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánches, the iconic founders of the found footage genre. As the film goes on, there is a jarring blend of comedy with horror as the film seems to lose its feel from the grossly sexual, eerie, creepy folk-horror placement to a chaotic spew of violence which loses its grip on viewers. Whilst the film has great potential in its opening, this unfortunately is not lived up to, there is certainly enjoyment to be had in the bizarre direction the film takes. God of Frogs still maintains its horror genre, with an exciting use of blood and gore throughout, keeping the screen full of action, despite faltering on some narrative aspects. God of Frogs is on UK digital 2 March from Miracle Media.
Forum Posts (804)
- “YOUR MOVE” - REVIEW: Over the Edge, Into the DarknessIn Film Reviews·January 27, 2018There is an apocryphal saying - variously attributed to Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Mark Twain and a host of others - that there are only two stories we tell each other in our literature, our movies, our narrative arts. In the first, a person goes on a journey; in the second, a stranger comes to town. What matters is not which of these stories an artist chooses, but how it’s told, and how it illuminates another corner of the human soul, be it dark or light. With “Your Move” actor/director/writer Luke Goss effectively combines the two in the person of his protagonist, who must go on a journey to save what he loves most in the world, becoming a stranger in the dark underworld of a Mexican town where clues and danger are virtually indistinguishable. Goss - up to now known as an actor’s actor and platinum-selling musician - proves highly adept at this newest iteration of his abilities, guiding what in other hands might be a standard genre story forward with skill and subtlety. By keeping the focus on the inner workings of his characters Goss creates as much nerve-wracking tension with a quiet tableau between two people as he does with an all-out chase scene. Goss plays New York businessman David Miller, a man with a good life and a family he adores. While on a video call with his wife Isabel (Patricia De Leon) and young daughter Savannah (Laura Martin), who are in Mexico visiting Isabel’s parents, David - back home in New York - witnesses a brutal attack on them that ends in an apparent kidnapping. Stuck thousands of miles away and not knowing where to turn, David calls the local NYPD, whose skeptical response only makes him realize how dire his family’s situation actually is. As an actor Goss is deeply likable, exceptionally effective at translating what his characters are feeling, and the terror David experiences at not knowing what has happened to his loved ones is brutal and palpable. In Mexico he meets the cop in charge of the case, Detective Romero (the superb Robert Davi, in a richly nuanced performance). David wants answers, action, anything to make him feel that progress is being made. Romero, a good detective, understands the need to build his case on facts, and while Romero feels for David’s plight, the man is also his worst nightmare - an uncontrolled wild card who could blow the case at a moment’s notice by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Romero’s careful, low-key approach to the investigation seems like dangerous and deadly plodding from David’s point of view, sure to get his wife and daughter killed. On the other side of the coin is Isabel’s father, Señor Barrabas, a wealthy patrón of weight and gravity. Luis Gatica plays Barrabas with a quiet intensity that is at once civilized and menacing. Though he treats David and the detective as equals, he appears to engender fear and respect everywhere else. Accompanied at all times by a suited, hulking - and likely armed - bodyguard, who Goss subtley keeps just at the edge of the frame, Barrabas’ business dealings can only be guessed at. When it appears that he agrees with Romero’s method of handling the case, David panicks and takes matters into his own hands. Though fit and athletic, David has no “special set of skills” with which to make the bad guy’s life hell a’la the uber-hero in “Taken”, relying instead on instinct and sheer persistence, driven by the certain terror that if he doesn’t use every means at his disposal to track his family down, he will never see them again. Agonizing every step of the way over what he must become to get the job done, he isolates himself from both family and the authorities and relies instead on his gut. Goss’s abilities as a visual stylist and storyteller are well-matched to his subject matter and the camerawork is assured, but he doesn’t sacrifice character development for the sake of style. Goss - who also wrote the script - keeps the dialogue spare and measured, making wonderful use of the players’ inner lives to push the narrative and generate emotion. The acting is uniformly superb and the casting and directing are spot-on, with a touching and almost Fellini-esque sensibility, making scenes with even the most secondary characters satisfying and rewarding. The landscape of the human face as a map of the psyche clearly fascinates Goss at the deepest levels, and his painterly use of color, light and shadow add to the suspense and the unfolding story, while allowing the audience their own visual and emotional journey. And though the church is never explicitly mentioned there is a strain of lush religious iconography running through the film, implying religion as a particularly horrifying form of self-justification for the antagonist, played by Alain Mora in a performance that is a revelatory and disturbing portrayal of a man with a terrifying split in his psyche. The film may be billed as a psychological thriller, but the execution and performances defy simple genre categorization. It would appear that “Your Move” marks the auspicious start of yet another successful branch of Goss’s multi-hyphenate career. “Your Move” has its UK premiere on January 27, 2017. Watch the trailer, here: Writer: Kely Lyons - Los Angeles - January 27, 2018361967
- "Crazy Right" movie trailerIn Movie Trailers·March 5, 201824186
- Beauty and the Beast (2017) ReviewIn Film Reviews·November 1, 2017Disney is back with another live-action adaptation of one of their animated films. This time it was up to Beauty and the Beast to be remade and please the audience. But if we look at the final product that the film is, it seems to be that Disney did it more for the money than for the audience. Will the audience end up roaring for the new film or will it just be Disney happily roaring their victory over their audience? I think we all know the answer to that question. Beauty and the Beast is directed by Bill Condon and tells the tale of Belle. Belle (Emma Watson) is a young adult, who loves to read books and dreaming of playing a part in the adventures that are depicted on those pages. But when she leaves her small village to find her missing father (Kevin Kline), she encounters a large castle in which lives a horrifying Beast (Dan Stevens). As Belle stays with the Beast, she learns that true beauty is found within. Right from the beginning, the film wants to make very clear what kind of a jerk the Beast was before he came a Beast. Just like in the original animated film, where they spend a short monologue on the case. However, in this live-action adaptation they take more then a few minutes to make it clear that the Beast is a jerk. The problem is not that it is not well done, because making the Beast look arrogant is something the movie does is quite well, but the problem is that right from the beginning one of our main characters is an unlikeable prick, which creates a situation wherein you cannot root for the Beast to become normal again. You want him to stay a Beast, because that’s what he honestly deserves to be. He acts like a Beast for the first two acts of the movie. Then the filmmakers remembered that the Beast also must become a human at the end, so they quickly shoved moments in the movie trying to make the Beast look less like a prick and more like an misunderstood young adult. In the original animated film, the Beast had a compelling arc. In this film he does have an arc, but it’s not compelling because the Beast is arrogant throughout most of the film and acts like a prick to everyone around him. The arc is also rushed to the point that it makes you care even less for the Beast. Do you want examples of how much of a prick the Beast is? Well, the Beast doesn’t even give Belle a minute to say goodbye to her father, the Beast keeps correcting and interrupting Belle, the Beast wouldn’t give Belle a room, the Beast forces Belle to eat with him and lets her starve when she says she won’t eat with him etc. The thing with this movie is that they like to exaggerate everything the original did, to the point that this movie feels more like a dark cartoon then the original did.The scriptwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos also try to add new story elements to the script. There is a new back-story how both Belle and the Beast lost their mothers and it adds nothing new to the story. The scriptwriters probably did this trying to make the Beast, after first writing him as such an unlikable character, look more sympathetic and to give Belle an arc. Only thing is that the new back-story doesn’t make Beast look more sympathetic, he still comes across, as a bitter young adult and Belle never gets a conclusion to her arc. Her mother died when she was just a baby. Belle never knew her mother and this has had a great impact on her. However when she finally finds out, what happened to her mother, the subplot is quickly moved aside to continue the main story. Her arc is never resolved or even started to be honest. It just a waste of time. The script also tries to give Belle more personality. They did this by making her amazing in everything. She is good in reading, good with children, good in teaching, good in inventing, good in drawing, good in taming wild beasts (get it?). However, as expected, being good in everything doesn’t count as a trademark for a character. She isn’t Leonardo Da Vinci. Belle is a dreamer, who gets inspired by the books she reads. Belle is intellectual. Indeed. But in this movie they exaggerated her intelligence to the point that this Belle feels more like a cartoon character then her animated counterpart. There are also some continuity errors. Belle on Phillipe, the horse, move like the Flash when needed. Belle just arrives shortly after the villagers arrive at the castle, while the villagers had a big head start. The sound effects are also sometimes off in the final battle. Oh right, forgot. To please the immature and the children, the movie also includes butt and poop jokes. Yeah! There is also a mystery subplot for the character Agathe, which turns out to be the witch that cursed the Beast. This is so poorly done and unnecessary. She just comes and goes when the story needs her to come an go. And her importance to the story is never explained. Which leaves another unsolved subplot.The CGI in this film is, in contrary to the beautiful The Jungle Book, more creepy than fantasy provoking. Nobody wants to see a CGI teapot smiling. They created some nice nightmare related visuals for the younger kids. Can’t wait to see this on a childhood trauma list.Not everything is bad though. The acting is on point. Especially Gaston is likeable, which feels weird because he’s supposed to be villain of the film. Well don’t worry, because for this first half of the film Gaston comes across as a normal, somewhat dimwitted, individual, but in the second half, he leaves Maurice for the wolves stuck at a tree. Something the animated Gaston would probably also be able to do. The Gaston song is also very amusing. Their is actually an illiterate joke in their that works. The song also contains one exciting, maybe little expectable, but still amusing shot. In the end, Beauty and the Beast, is another Disney remake that is poorly executed and is solely done for the money. This movie in particular felt more like a cash grab than the other Disney movies. That is probably because the effect of the original is still untouched by other Disney movies. It is the only animated movie to be nominated for best picture. It is one of the most well known Disney movies. These were the reasons for which Disney thought that their live-action version could earn some big money. Sadly, it did. Overall, it’s not a complete failure. There are some genuine emotional moments. Some new interesting ideas, that all don’t workout however. And sometimes a joke works. But in the end, the movie is still pretty bad, mostly thanks to the poor script.15182
.png)










