Search Results
9694 results found with an empty search
Other Pages (3597)
- 1000 Women in Horror Review | Film Reviews
1000 Women in Horror film review by UK film critic Hope Madden. Starring Mary Harron, Jenn Wexler, Nikyatu Jusu, Mattie Do, Rosanne Liang directed by Donna Davies. HOME | FILMS | REVIEWS 1000 Women in Horror Film Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Critic: Hope Madden | Posted on: Mar 18, 2026 Directed by: Donna Davies Written by: Alexandra Heller-Nicholas Starring: Mary Harron, Jenn Wexler, Nikyatu Jusu, Mattie Do, Rosanne Liang Shudder has produced some fascinating and enlightening documentaries about the genre they serve. Both the film Horror Noire: A History of Black Horror and the series Queer for Fear: The History of Queer Horror shine overdue light on the history of films and filmmakers genre lovers need to know. In that vein comes Donna Davies’s 1000 Women in Horror . The doc is written for the screen by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas, on whose nonfiction book it’s based. Longtime film critic and genre expert, Heller-Nicholas contributed brilliantly to Alexandre O. Phillipe’s 2024 Texas Chain Saw Massacre doc Chain Reactions , as well as Kier-La Janisse’s 2021 doc Woodlands Dark and Days Bewitched . She knows her way around a horror documentary, is what I’m saying. So does Davies, for that matter, whose 2009 TV doc Pretty Bloody: The Women of Horror swam similar waters. The title is an intentional joke. As the film makes clear, women have been a driving creative force in horror films for more than a century. But the film doesn’t spend much time focusing on individual women as much as it does basic genre themes that relate to women: childbirth, the depiction of women on screen at different stages of their lives, and rape, for example. We do hear from some powerful creators, though. Mary Harron (American Psycho ), Nikyatu Jusu (Nanny ), Jenn Wexler (The Sacrifice Game ),Gigi Saul Guerrero (Bingo Hell ) and loads more shed light on how women create and are reflected in horror cinema. The interviews are sometimes fascinating and often ferocious. Kate Siegel expresses the conflict underlying childbirth in horror better than most could. Throughout, it’s such a joy to deconstruct certain tropes with women, to hear how these tropes—for better or worse—influenced these filmmakers. A little more of a history lesson would have been appreciated. I’d love to have made myself a list of vintage horror and, more importantly, early pioneers to dig into after the film was through. But when I think of the number of documentaries on cinema I’ve seen over the decades that included solely the voices of men, having just one that asks the opinions of only women experts feels revolutionary in itself. About the Film Critic Hope Madden Digital / DVD Release, Documentary < All Reviews Next Film Review >
- Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Film reviews from some of the biggest movies in UK cinemas. We also review short films, indie films, and documentaries. Find a movie review now. Film Reviews Here at UK Film Review we like to tackle all kinds film reviews. Our writers come from all walks of life, and feel passionate about critiquing the movies they watch. From the latest Theatrical Releases to Short Films, Indie Films, Documentaries and even Animation, the contributors of UK Film Review are as eager to please as Dev Patel in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011). If you are a filmmaker, or are working in film PR and want to promote one of your clients, please get in touch using the Submit Your Film button under the drop-down menu for Home. Take a look at our list of film reviews below from some of the hottest releases in UK cinemas. Simply click the image of the review you would like, or the title of the movie. Or use the search button to find the movie you are looking for. We have given any feature length film a star rating (out of 5) in order to help viewers sort the Citizen Kanes from the Waterworlds, the Inceptions from the Transformers. Michael Bay will be given a fair film review from our writers, but that probably will not go in his favour. Speaking of Filmmakers, head over to our Filmmaker Features page for awesome articles about some of the best filmmaking geniuses who ever lived. Movie Trailers are also available, either underneath the film reviews, or on the Movie Trailers page. And lastly, if you like your film reviews verbalised. Simply because reading is boring and listening is marvellous, then make sure you Subscribe to the UK Film Review Podcast. Our critics offer up some banterous opinions on the best and worst movies across all genres. Head over to the Podcast page, or click this link to go straight to iTunes. If you would like to read or view any of the following, simply use the navigation. Alternatively, you can click on one of the images to read the film reviews here, or simply have a ganders at the lovely movie artwork on display. Remember to listen to film reviews on our regular film podcast. GET REVIEWED average rating is 4 out of 5 1000 Women in Horror Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Project Hail Mary Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Summer of '94 Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Lovely To Meet You Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Sorry We're Closed Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Phase Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Heel Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The Bride! Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Billy Idol Should Be Dead Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Hoppers Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Drowned Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Scream 7 Read Review Spoilers in our film reviews As with all digital forms of expression sometimes people may find something that upsets them online. Spoilers can often be one of these things! Whilst we do our best to ensure that major plot points, twists, character deaths and celebrity cameos are not found in our reviews, it can sometimes be difficult to judge what each and every film lover on the planet would to be a spoiler. If you feel that one of our film reviews contains one too many details then please do let us (politely) know using our social media platforms. We may then take serious action, such as expelling the critic responsible from this and every other movie publication past and present, declaring war against the studio for leading our writer into temptation, or we may do nothing at all. To be honest, it is most likely going to be the latter unless some serious rules have been broken. You may also see some movie trailers in our reviews that could also contain potential spoilers. In which case anyone who is hoping to avoid these should probably not click the play button on them. Or click the play button, turn the sound down on your device, then leave the room for a least 28 minutes whilst the trailer finishes and leaves your life naturally. You may be wondering what you could do with all 28 of those minutes! Why not read some more film reviews on another device? Or make a short film of your cat playing with a piece of string? Spend it wisely guys and gals.
- Music Video Reviews | UK Film Review
Read music video reviews by film critics at UK Film Review. Submit your music video for review by clicking Get Reviewed at the top of the website. Music Video Reviews One of the most exciting sub-genres our critics review is music videos. They are often incredible pieces of storytelling, either in their own right or aligned with the song playing over them. On this page you will find a great selection of music video reviews from the team of critics at UK Film Review. If you are a filmmaker or artist who would like us to review your music video, submit your film here . When it comes to reviewing a music video, the process differs slightly from perhaps a narrative short film or documentary. The music has to be explored far more intimately than if it were a soundtrack because that's where the story originates from rather than being added further down the line. Music videos do conform to genres but these are often musical genres rather than film categories, for example pop, folk, rock, rap etc. So this will also influence the music video review our critics write because the target audience is going to be considered. Music videos may take a variety of forms or even combine different aspects to create a different effect on the viewer. For example, it is common for a music video to contain a small narrative, as well as live performance footage. Top filmmakers making music videos will be able to immerse you into the song and story without leaving you feeling like you have just watched a promo piece. Choreography is also a common trait in music videos, with dance sequences and flash mobs recurring - often in pop music videos. Editors of music videos will have their work cut out to ensure the choreography looks tight and engaging without it feeling staged or lifeless. Hopefully the array of music video reviews you see below will include some gems for you to peruse. Don't forget to scroll to the bottom of the article, as we often include the actual music video so you can watch it for yourself. RAUNCHADELIC Matt Trapp CATACLYSM William Curzon Psiblingz - Till We're Found William Curzon Mammoth: Adventures In Gnomeman's Land William Hemingway Flesh Wanting Blood William Hemingway Lovin' You James Learoyd To Be Frank Chris Olson The Wanderer Matt Trapp The Sanctity of Faith Patrick Foley Bitter Cherry – Hunger Short Film Review alexjames96 Jun 3, 2025 2 min read Ain’t my Vibe Short Music Video Review alexjames96 Jun 6, 2024 2 min read Cinerama (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Mar 17, 2024 2 min read Homecoming (Music Video) Short Film Review alexjames96 Dec 19, 2023 2 min read Sheep F-cked In the Head Short Film Review alexjames96 Nov 16, 2023 2 min read Service for The King short film review Theo Aug 1, 2022 2 min read More Film Reviews
Blog Posts (5260)
- New Rockumentary - Dead City Punx - To Have LA Premiere This April
Film Feature by Chris Olson This April, Los Angeles is set to host the world premiere of a project that, on paper at least, sounds like the most explosive addition to the genre in years: Dead City Punx . As someone who has spent a significant portion of my life submerged in the world of music documentaries, I find my anticipation for this particular release reaching a fever pitch. We often talk about "DIY culture" in the film world as a polished aesthetic, but Dead City Punx seems poised to drag that definition back into the mud and the fire where it belongs. Presented by BEYOND THE STREETS, the film follows the eponymous band—Meka, Grumpy, Mike, and Adrian—who essentially resuscitated the Los Angeles music scene during the pandemic through sheer, illegal force of will. DEAD CITY PUNX - Official Trailer The pedigree behind the camera is what first caught my eye. The documentary is executive produced by Roger Gastman, Joseph Pattisall, and, most intriguingly, Zack de la Rocha . As a lifelong fan of Rage Against the Machine, seeing de la Rocha’s name attached to a film project carries immense weight. He has always been an artist who demands authenticity and systemic challenge; for him to put his stamp on the story of the Dead City Punx suggests that this is far more than a simple concert film. It is a political statement. From what we know so far, the story of the band is the stuff of underground legend. Born from stolen equipment and street-life connections, they didn't just play gigs; they staged tactical occupations. Using social media as a "bat signal," they drew massive crowds to illegal outdoor shows featuring shoplifted wooden stages, graffiti backdrops, and literal bonfires. These weren't just performances; they were confrontations that pitted the band against the LAPD, the LAFD, and the Mayor’s office. What fascinates me most about this upcoming premiere is the promise of "raw, unfiltered" footage. Much of the film is built from fan-filmed concert tapes and exclusive interviews, capturing the moments when police helicopters began to circle overhead. In an era where music can often feel commodified and safe, the idea of a band that "makes shows a crime scene" is incredibly refreshing. It forces the viewer to confront what punk actually means when the stakes move beyond fashion and into the realm of the right to assemble in public space. The world premiere screenings are taking place on 16 April 2026 at The Regent Theater in Los Angeles, with a follow-up gallery opening at BEYOND THE STREETS on 17 April. While I won’t be in the heart of the mosh pit at The Regent myself, the ripples of this release are already being felt across the Atlantic. For those of us in the UK film community, we are watching closely. We need films that remind us of the margins of society—the outcasts who refuse to be silenced even when the world shuts down. If Dead City Punx can capture even a fraction of the mayhem it describes, we are looking at a landmark piece of music journalism.
- NOFX: 40 Years of Fuckin’ Up Documentary Review
Directed by: James Buddy Day Produced by: Fat Mike Starring: Fat Mike, Aaron ‘El Hefe’ Abeyta, Eric Melvin and Erik 'Smelly' Sandin Documentary Review by : Chris Olson ★★★★ The band that seemed to be a precursor to all the other punk bands you have heard of, NOFX were in the headlines back in 2024 for announcing their farewell tour. Having been a formidable part of the underground punk rock scene since 1983, this swan song, unlike that from a lot of other aged rock bands, was an actual goodbye, with frontman and bassist Fat Mike declaring himself done with NOFX. This documentary, directed by James Buddy Day, is a snorts-and-all roc-doc that captures the band’s anarchic authenticity perfectly right through to their final three shows. As an audience, we are greeted with a significant amount of turbulence and drama in the band in the opening scenes of the film. We learn that Fat Mike has been recently diagnosed with diabetes (whether he knows which type is another thing) and must give up booze and drugs if he wants to keep living, something he’s not prepared to do at the same time as being a live performer with NOFX. His relationship with alcohol and drugs forms a big chunk of NOFX: 40 Years of Fuckin’ Up . We also learn that fellow band member Eric Melvin is taking legal action against Mike, accusing him of skimming money from their farewell tour. Known for being a DIY band, James Buddy Day has opted for a similarly unpolished environment for this piece to play out in. At times, it’s hard to determine what’s real drama and what’s tongue-in-cheek playfulness, and there is an anarchic spirit alive in every frame. Whether it’s the raw, live music shows, Mike’s penchant for fetishism and latex, or him openly snorting cocaine on camera, very little is off the table here (just make sure it doesn’t have holes in…the coke falls through). And whilst we are kept on our toes in terms of how much of the drama is theatrical licence, there is an undeniable melancholy to the whole journey. 40 years for any band is a long time, and having stuck it out for so long, eschewing labels and “selling out”, the toll is clear on this gaggle of punk rockers. Now in their late fifties, most of the band are moving on with other projects, calming down with hobbies and new passions, whilst trying to come to terms with the end of something artistically gigantic. There is an epic timescale for this band’s journey, which deserves the roc-doc treatment. We get some wonderful talking heads from the likes of Sum 41, The Offspring, and Frank Turner, as well as archive footage featuring Blink 182, Green Day and more. The final show itself saw an array of legends hit the stage with the band, playing from combo amps and generally going out with style. This network of ne’er-do-wells shows the immense legacy of NOFX and how far their influence spreads. With any roc-doc, we are always going to prepare for narcissistic groin rubbing and jolly outings to old haunts, or talking heads waxing lyrical. This feels more like a refreshing clamps-on-the-nipples type of journey with the blood, sweat, and tears (literally in the case of the former) coming out of both ends. Cue the duelling banjos, please.
- All The Winners at The Oscars 2026
Film Feature by Chris Olson The curtains have fallen on the 98th Academy Awards, and while the Dolby Theatre has seen its fair share of predictable sweeps in the past, the 2026 ceremony felt like a genuine clash of titans. As we look over the wreckage of the awards season, it is clear that the night belonged to a gritty, sprawling American epic and a supernatural genre-bender that redefined the blockbuster. The evening’s biggest victor was undoubtedly Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another . Still on my to-watch list, its dominance is impossible to ignore. Taking home Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay, Anderson has finally secured the "triple crown" that has eluded him for decades. The film also proved to be an acting powerhouse, securing Best Supporting Actor for Sean Penn. It is a formidable haul for a film that many critics have described as Anderson’s most demanding work to date, and its success here suggests the Academy is leaning back toward the "Big Film" era of filmmaking. One Battle After Another Wins Best Picture at The Oscars 2026 However, for those of us who championed the more visceral, genre-focused side of cinema this year, the success of Ryan Coogler’s Sinners was the real story of the night. Having seen Coogler’s latest, I can attest that it is a masterclass in tension and atmosphere. Michael B. Jordan’s win for Best Actor felt like a just reward for a career-best performance; he anchored a film that was as much a psychological study as it was a supernatural thriller. Michael B. Jordan Wins Best Actor at The Oscars 2026 Sinners didn't just stop at the acting categories; it cleaned up in the technical and creative fields, taking home Best Original Screenplay for Coogler’s tight, inventive script, as well as Best Original Score for Ludwig Goransson and Best Cinematography for Autumn Durald Arkapaw. The film’s visual and auditory identity was second to none this year, and I am thrilled to see the Academy recognise such bold, stylish choices. Jessie Buckley Wins Best Actress for Hamnet at The Oscars 2026 In the acting categories, Jessie Buckley continued her ascent to legendary status by taking home Best Actress for Hamnet . Although I am still catching up with Chloé Zhao’s latest, the buzz surrounding Buckley’s performance has been deafening since its premiere. Hamnet also put up a strong fight in the craft categories, though it was often edged out by the night's other visual powerhouse: Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein . Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a film I found utterly transfixing, a gothic dream that only he could conjure. While it may have missed out on the "Above the Line" trophies, it proved unbeatable in the aesthetic categories. The film won Best Production Design, Best Make-up and Hairstyling, and Best Costume Design. Seeing del Toro’s vision of the creature and its world rewarded in this way was a highlight of the ceremony; it is a film that breathes through its textures and shadows. KPop Demon Hunters Wins Best Original Song at The Oscars 2026 Perhaps the most delightful surprise for me was the success of KPop Demon Hunters in the Best Animated Feature category. This film is a neon-soaked, high-energy riot that I enjoyed immensely (I have two young daughters who watch it on repeat), and seeing it best the likes of Zootopia 2 shows a refreshing willingness from the Academy to embrace international influence and contemporary pop culture. Its win for Best Original Song with "Golden" was the cherry on top, cementing the film as a cultural phenomenon rather than just a niche hit. As we look toward the 2026 cinematic calendar, the bar has been set incredibly high. Whether it was the sweeping historical scale of One Battle After Another or the sharp, supernatural edge of Sinners , the 98th Oscars celebrated a year where cinema felt truly vital, diverse, and, above all, daring. The Full List of Oscar Winners 2026: Best picture WINNER: One Battle After Another Best actress WINNER: Jessie Buckley - Hamnet Best actor WINNER: Michael B Jordan - Sinners Best supporting actress WINNER: Amy Madigan - Weapons Best supporting actor WINNER: Sean Penn - One Battle After Another Best director WINNER: Paul Thomas Anderson - One Battle After Another Best animated feature WINNER: KPop Demon Hunters Best international feature WINNER: Sentimental Value Best documentary feature WINNER: Mr Nobody Against Putin Best original screenplay WINNER: Sinners - Ryan Coogler Best adapted screenplay WINNER: One Battle After Another - Paul Thomas Anderson Best original song WINNER: Golden - KPop Demon Hunters (by EJAE, Mark Sonnenblick, Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo and Teddy Park) Best original score WINNER: Sinners - Ludwig Goransson Best cinematography WINNER: Sinners - Autumn Durald Arkapaw Best film editing WINNER: One Battle After Another - Andy Jurgensen Best sound WINNER: F1 - Gareth John, Al Nelson, Gwendolyn Yates Whittle, Gary A Rizzo and Juan Peralta Best visual effects WINNER: Avatar: Fire and Ash - Joe Letteri, Richard Baneham, Eric Saindon and Daniel Barrett Best production design WINNER: Frankenstein - Tamara Deverell and Shane Vieau Best casting WINNER: One Battle After Another - Cassandra Kulukundis Best make-up and hairstyling WINNER: Frankenstein - Mike Hill, Jordan Samuel and Cliona Furey Best costume design WINNER: Frankenstein - Kate Hawley Best animated short WINNER: The Girl Who Cried Pearls Best live action short WINNER (TIED): The Singers WINNER (TIED): Two People Exchanging Saliva Best documentary short WINNER: All the Empty Rooms
Forum Posts (804)
- “YOUR MOVE” - REVIEW: Over the Edge, Into the DarknessIn Film Reviews·January 27, 2018There is an apocryphal saying - variously attributed to Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Mark Twain and a host of others - that there are only two stories we tell each other in our literature, our movies, our narrative arts. In the first, a person goes on a journey; in the second, a stranger comes to town. What matters is not which of these stories an artist chooses, but how it’s told, and how it illuminates another corner of the human soul, be it dark or light. With “Your Move” actor/director/writer Luke Goss effectively combines the two in the person of his protagonist, who must go on a journey to save what he loves most in the world, becoming a stranger in the dark underworld of a Mexican town where clues and danger are virtually indistinguishable. Goss - up to now known as an actor’s actor and platinum-selling musician - proves highly adept at this newest iteration of his abilities, guiding what in other hands might be a standard genre story forward with skill and subtlety. By keeping the focus on the inner workings of his characters Goss creates as much nerve-wracking tension with a quiet tableau between two people as he does with an all-out chase scene. Goss plays New York businessman David Miller, a man with a good life and a family he adores. While on a video call with his wife Isabel (Patricia De Leon) and young daughter Savannah (Laura Martin), who are in Mexico visiting Isabel’s parents, David - back home in New York - witnesses a brutal attack on them that ends in an apparent kidnapping. Stuck thousands of miles away and not knowing where to turn, David calls the local NYPD, whose skeptical response only makes him realize how dire his family’s situation actually is. As an actor Goss is deeply likable, exceptionally effective at translating what his characters are feeling, and the terror David experiences at not knowing what has happened to his loved ones is brutal and palpable. In Mexico he meets the cop in charge of the case, Detective Romero (the superb Robert Davi, in a richly nuanced performance). David wants answers, action, anything to make him feel that progress is being made. Romero, a good detective, understands the need to build his case on facts, and while Romero feels for David’s plight, the man is also his worst nightmare - an uncontrolled wild card who could blow the case at a moment’s notice by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Romero’s careful, low-key approach to the investigation seems like dangerous and deadly plodding from David’s point of view, sure to get his wife and daughter killed. On the other side of the coin is Isabel’s father, Señor Barrabas, a wealthy patrón of weight and gravity. Luis Gatica plays Barrabas with a quiet intensity that is at once civilized and menacing. Though he treats David and the detective as equals, he appears to engender fear and respect everywhere else. Accompanied at all times by a suited, hulking - and likely armed - bodyguard, who Goss subtley keeps just at the edge of the frame, Barrabas’ business dealings can only be guessed at. When it appears that he agrees with Romero’s method of handling the case, David panicks and takes matters into his own hands. Though fit and athletic, David has no “special set of skills” with which to make the bad guy’s life hell a’la the uber-hero in “Taken”, relying instead on instinct and sheer persistence, driven by the certain terror that if he doesn’t use every means at his disposal to track his family down, he will never see them again. Agonizing every step of the way over what he must become to get the job done, he isolates himself from both family and the authorities and relies instead on his gut. Goss’s abilities as a visual stylist and storyteller are well-matched to his subject matter and the camerawork is assured, but he doesn’t sacrifice character development for the sake of style. Goss - who also wrote the script - keeps the dialogue spare and measured, making wonderful use of the players’ inner lives to push the narrative and generate emotion. The acting is uniformly superb and the casting and directing are spot-on, with a touching and almost Fellini-esque sensibility, making scenes with even the most secondary characters satisfying and rewarding. The landscape of the human face as a map of the psyche clearly fascinates Goss at the deepest levels, and his painterly use of color, light and shadow add to the suspense and the unfolding story, while allowing the audience their own visual and emotional journey. And though the church is never explicitly mentioned there is a strain of lush religious iconography running through the film, implying religion as a particularly horrifying form of self-justification for the antagonist, played by Alain Mora in a performance that is a revelatory and disturbing portrayal of a man with a terrifying split in his psyche. The film may be billed as a psychological thriller, but the execution and performances defy simple genre categorization. It would appear that “Your Move” marks the auspicious start of yet another successful branch of Goss’s multi-hyphenate career. “Your Move” has its UK premiere on January 27, 2017. Watch the trailer, here: Writer: Kely Lyons - Los Angeles - January 27, 2018361967
- "Crazy Right" movie trailerIn Movie Trailers·March 5, 201824186
- Beauty and the Beast (2017) ReviewIn Film Reviews·November 1, 2017Disney is back with another live-action adaptation of one of their animated films. This time it was up to Beauty and the Beast to be remade and please the audience. But if we look at the final product that the film is, it seems to be that Disney did it more for the money than for the audience. Will the audience end up roaring for the new film or will it just be Disney happily roaring their victory over their audience? I think we all know the answer to that question. Beauty and the Beast is directed by Bill Condon and tells the tale of Belle. Belle (Emma Watson) is a young adult, who loves to read books and dreaming of playing a part in the adventures that are depicted on those pages. But when she leaves her small village to find her missing father (Kevin Kline), she encounters a large castle in which lives a horrifying Beast (Dan Stevens). As Belle stays with the Beast, she learns that true beauty is found within. Right from the beginning, the film wants to make very clear what kind of a jerk the Beast was before he came a Beast. Just like in the original animated film, where they spend a short monologue on the case. However, in this live-action adaptation they take more then a few minutes to make it clear that the Beast is a jerk. The problem is not that it is not well done, because making the Beast look arrogant is something the movie does is quite well, but the problem is that right from the beginning one of our main characters is an unlikeable prick, which creates a situation wherein you cannot root for the Beast to become normal again. You want him to stay a Beast, because that’s what he honestly deserves to be. He acts like a Beast for the first two acts of the movie. Then the filmmakers remembered that the Beast also must become a human at the end, so they quickly shoved moments in the movie trying to make the Beast look less like a prick and more like an misunderstood young adult. In the original animated film, the Beast had a compelling arc. In this film he does have an arc, but it’s not compelling because the Beast is arrogant throughout most of the film and acts like a prick to everyone around him. The arc is also rushed to the point that it makes you care even less for the Beast. Do you want examples of how much of a prick the Beast is? Well, the Beast doesn’t even give Belle a minute to say goodbye to her father, the Beast keeps correcting and interrupting Belle, the Beast wouldn’t give Belle a room, the Beast forces Belle to eat with him and lets her starve when she says she won’t eat with him etc. The thing with this movie is that they like to exaggerate everything the original did, to the point that this movie feels more like a dark cartoon then the original did.The scriptwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos also try to add new story elements to the script. There is a new back-story how both Belle and the Beast lost their mothers and it adds nothing new to the story. The scriptwriters probably did this trying to make the Beast, after first writing him as such an unlikable character, look more sympathetic and to give Belle an arc. Only thing is that the new back-story doesn’t make Beast look more sympathetic, he still comes across, as a bitter young adult and Belle never gets a conclusion to her arc. Her mother died when she was just a baby. Belle never knew her mother and this has had a great impact on her. However when she finally finds out, what happened to her mother, the subplot is quickly moved aside to continue the main story. Her arc is never resolved or even started to be honest. It just a waste of time. The script also tries to give Belle more personality. They did this by making her amazing in everything. She is good in reading, good with children, good in teaching, good in inventing, good in drawing, good in taming wild beasts (get it?). However, as expected, being good in everything doesn’t count as a trademark for a character. She isn’t Leonardo Da Vinci. Belle is a dreamer, who gets inspired by the books she reads. Belle is intellectual. Indeed. But in this movie they exaggerated her intelligence to the point that this Belle feels more like a cartoon character then her animated counterpart. There are also some continuity errors. Belle on Phillipe, the horse, move like the Flash when needed. Belle just arrives shortly after the villagers arrive at the castle, while the villagers had a big head start. The sound effects are also sometimes off in the final battle. Oh right, forgot. To please the immature and the children, the movie also includes butt and poop jokes. Yeah! There is also a mystery subplot for the character Agathe, which turns out to be the witch that cursed the Beast. This is so poorly done and unnecessary. She just comes and goes when the story needs her to come an go. And her importance to the story is never explained. Which leaves another unsolved subplot.The CGI in this film is, in contrary to the beautiful The Jungle Book, more creepy than fantasy provoking. Nobody wants to see a CGI teapot smiling. They created some nice nightmare related visuals for the younger kids. Can’t wait to see this on a childhood trauma list.Not everything is bad though. The acting is on point. Especially Gaston is likeable, which feels weird because he’s supposed to be villain of the film. Well don’t worry, because for this first half of the film Gaston comes across as a normal, somewhat dimwitted, individual, but in the second half, he leaves Maurice for the wolves stuck at a tree. Something the animated Gaston would probably also be able to do. The Gaston song is also very amusing. Their is actually an illiterate joke in their that works. The song also contains one exciting, maybe little expectable, but still amusing shot. In the end, Beauty and the Beast, is another Disney remake that is poorly executed and is solely done for the money. This movie in particular felt more like a cash grab than the other Disney movies. That is probably because the effect of the original is still untouched by other Disney movies. It is the only animated movie to be nominated for best picture. It is one of the most well known Disney movies. These were the reasons for which Disney thought that their live-action version could earn some big money. Sadly, it did. Overall, it’s not a complete failure. There are some genuine emotional moments. Some new interesting ideas, that all don’t workout however. And sometimes a joke works. But in the end, the movie is still pretty bad, mostly thanks to the poor script.15182
.png)










