Search Results
9433 results found with an empty search
Other Pages (3431)
- Roadman: The Pilot Review | Film Reviews
Roadman: The Pilot film review by UK film critic William Curzon. Starring Michael Momodu, Beatrice Fletcher, Lanre Danmola, Fabian Spencer directed by Damien Brewer. HOME | FILMS | REVIEWS Roadman: The Pilot Film Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Critic: William Curzon | Posted on: Dec 7, 2025 Directed by: Damien Brewer Written by: Damien Brewer Starring: Michael Momodu, Beatrice Fletcher, Lanre Danmola, Fabian Spencer Roadman: The Pilot is an episodic TV Movie with the first episode titled “Go Be A Roadman Fam”, following Big M (Michael Momodu) on his journey from becoming a Roadman from the small town of Basingstoke to the streets of London. The piece is evidently inspired by the hit series Top Boy (2011-2023) and the feature film Blue Story (2019), with its suburban setting and musical elements incorporated into the narrative. One of the most endearing qualities of the pilot episode is how rapidly Michael Momodu introduces you to the world of Roadman with his deeply charismatic voiceover, which pokes fun at the audience by breaking the fourth wall. Clearly wearing its influences on its sleeve with the use of grime needle drops and a suburban backdrop, it provides the viewer with enough exposition about the area and community, as well as suitable characterisation to care about Big M’s journey. It also makes incredible use of its limited budget restraints, keeping the story grounded by utilising creative formal decisions in its editing. Stylistically, the unique narrative device of music also helps to ground the piece. An impressive feat within the direction and screenplay by Damien Brewer is how incredibly well-paced the episode feels, with frenetic energy as Big M traverses around the area to tie up all his loose ends. Damien Brewer and Bogdan Sandu’s edit feels seamless as it perfectly transitions from high octane tension to more calm and collective pieces of dialogue between characters from the town of Basingstoke. Bogdan Sandu’s camerawork is slick and engaging, consisting primarily of wides, closeups and even handheld tracking of the actors during brief sequences of tension. Big M even makes light of the way Michael Bay shot Bad Boys 2 (2003) as it utilises a 360° arc shot around him and a brief inclusion of a drone shot, which may also be an ode to Bay’s style. This particular episode is profoundly comedic with its slapstick nature, and many of the gags thankfully land. Another major standout is that the tonal shifts are incorporated well, and it never takes itself too seriously, given its silly nature. It also makes suitable use of its runtime with its quick-paced structure and never overstaying its welcome, while leaving the viewer wanting more. This is helped by the pulse-pounding musical score. Many of the performances are fantastic, in particular Michael Momodu, who carries the material on his back with his incredible screen presence and comedic timing. The supporting cast has astounding chemistry and gives the piece a sense of community; Damien Brewer (who portrays Chunks) in particular is a standout. Sadly, the conclusion to this episode loses some momentum in the back half due to retreading similar themes and narrative beats. The pacing also becomes stagnant and loses the urgency that was prevalent in the first half. While it switches up its style with the use of music within its exposition and regains some of its needed energy back, the conclusion lacks the emotional resonance it's clearly grasping for. However, the ending sets up more material while suitably concluding the pilot section with a cliffhanger ending. Roadman: The Pilot “Go Be A Roadman Fam” is a fantastic introduction to the journey of Big M, brilliantly setting up his character arc and the surrounding community that has had a profound impact on his life. While it may lose its edge towards its conclusive moments, due to a rushed execution, this thankfully still works with its episodic nature. The pilot is ultimately a great start, which’ll undoubtedly improve with its future material. About the Film Critic William Curzon Web Series < All Reviews Next Film Review >
- Lunavom Review | Film Reviews
Lunavom film review by UK film critic Patrick Foley. Starring Muthu Karthikeyan directed by Muthu Karthikeyan. HOME | FILMS | REVIEWS Lunavom Film Review average rating is 1 out of 5 Critic: Patrick Foley | Posted on: Dec 7, 2025 Directed by: Muthu Karthikeyan Written by: Muthu Karthikeyan Starring: Muthu Karthikeyan An argument in favour of AI generation is that it could allow smaller or lone filmmakers to explore worlds and concepts that have been locked away behind million-dollar budgets since the invention of VFX. But on the basis of Lunavom, technology has a long, long way to go to bridging that gap – and a true understanding of character and human emotion will always outweigh visual spectacle: something able filmmakers ought to understand. Created by Tamil filmmaker Muthu Karthikeyan entirely with AI, the film is a sci-fi tale of a human colony based on the moon in the not-so-distant future after the collapse of humanity. A mysterious signal from Mount Kailash triggers an investigation, and a glimmer of hope emerges of a brighter future from the lessons of the past. There are important ethical questions about the use of AI in film that are far too extensive for a single review. Needless to say, many in the industry will find films like Lunavom controversial; my intent is to review this film independent of these. However, it really is impossible to separate it from the technology behind its creation. Most prominently is that for all the sci-fi spectacle, epic space sequences and photorealistic ‘actors’, the uncanny valley effect is completely overwhelming. Even 68-year-old Facebook users will be able to spot that the scenes are off, with the characters almost unanimously robotic and artificial. This is purportedly intentional, but it’s impossible to connect to their stories or invest emotionally when such a clear lack of humanity emanates from the screen. It is unlikely that Karthikeyan could have done much more to resolve this due to the technological limitations of the day, but whether the endeavour was worth proceeding with is another question due to this. The plot is based around Tamil mythologies implanted into a futuristic imagined world where humanity has nearly perished. It is an admirable idea to proceed with – one that will be unfamiliar to many Western audiences and one that may not otherwise be supported by large studios. It is these types of stories where an argument for AI use exists – that filmmakers who otherwise would be ignored can punch through the ceiling of financial restriction. But Lumavom does a poor job of explaining its quite complicated story aspects and concepts. Perhaps to those with prior familiarity with the culture, this will have more of an impact, but otherwise comes across as difficult to interact with. It also seems particularly galling to mention humanity forgoing real human experiences in place of the artificial as one of the film’s themes. If an appetite for fully AI films even exists, it is unlikely to be satisfied by Lunavom. The film is the definition of artificial and is utterly shallow despite occasional photorealism. There are far more interesting and fulfilling ways in which such a story could have been told, and whilst the questions around the benefits that the technology can have for small-scale films ought to still be pondered, AI superiority is still, thankfully, a long way off. About the Film Critic Patrick Foley Digital / DVD Release, Short Film, World Cinema, Animation < All Reviews Next Film Review >
- Film Reviews and Movie Trailers | UK Film Review
Film reviews and movie trailers for new movies, indie cinema and short films.Read a film review or watch a trailer on our website. FILM REVIEWS UK UK Film Review is a film reviews website based in London, UK. We promote films and movie trailers from around the world and support indie films that would usually find it hard to find the spotlight against the bigger films of cinema. From the latest blockbusters, to small indie cinema, we tackle as many films as we can. Reviewing them from all aspects, not just how many digital landscapes they blow up using CGI. We also review short films in the UK and internationally, helping filmmakers to promote their movies and raise their profile. If you would like to have a short or indie film reviewed by us, please submit all info using the button below. Take a look around, enjoy the spoils of filmmaking, film festivals and artistic expression. Our merry band of film critics are constantly hard at work, writing film reviews, or watching movie trailers for some of the most exciting movies coming out in UK cinemas. So to keep their morale up, please be nice...or at least funny if you choose to troll. Because, in the immortal words of Rick Moranis in the movie Spaceballs, "Keep firing A**holes!". By the way, on this film reviews website, you may see several references to Spaceballs. If you have not seen that classic Mel Brooks film, you MUST seek it out and tell us what you think. SUBMIT YOUR FILM Are You a Film Podcast Fan? Film critics Chris Olson and Brian Penn host a monthly podcast for all types of film fans! Whether you like the latest blockbuster releases, or streaming is your thing - we have you covered. We even review short and independent films on the podcast. Our final review is usually for a "Nostalgia" pick - something from the past worth revisiting. Previous picks for this have included Jaws, The Fly, and Good Will Hunting. Search UK Film Review Podcast wherever you like to listen and join our global community of film lovers. Get Reviewed On Our Podcast Film Reviews from UK film critics LATEST REVIEWS Lampros average rating is 4 out of 5 Lunavom average rating is 1 out of 5 Forever Young average rating is 4 out of 5 Roadman: The Pilot average rating is 4 out of 5 Armstrong: Dark Secrets average rating is 3 out of 5 Tripping Beneath The Spring Clouds average rating is 3 out of 5 Eraserheads: Combo on the Run average rating is 4 out of 5 Jake & Pete’s Christmas Special average rating is 3 out of 5 Merrily We Roll Along average rating is 3 out of 5 Hamnet average rating is 5 out of 5 Far From Water average rating is 3 out of 5 Just the Usual average rating is 4 out of 5 The Latest Film Trailers MOVIE TRAILERS Ready Or Not 2: Here I Come Shelter People We Meet On Vacation Doctor Plague Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery Michael Filmmaker Interviews INTERVIEWS
Blog Posts (5165)
- Play Pretend Film Review
Star rating: 5/5 Writer: Sophie- Dominique Parea Director: Sophie- Dominique Parea Starring: Ana Parvu, Damian Reyes- Fox This beautiful romantic drama written by Sophie- Dominique Parea asks the audience, softly: what do they think love is? Play Pretend is an incisive, wonderfully simple portrait of true emotional intimacy. This is done with a cast of two. Charlie and an unnamed female character (this is a problem) are our characters: two twenty-somethings who have been friends for some time and share their thoughts about navigating today’s dating world in a city, possibly London. They are the only characters in this sparse, thoughtful and precise script, in which we see the characters go through a huge, puzzling change in their bond. When an energy shifts in a deep relationship, it is hard to grasp and inhabit. Play Pretend portrays this fact of love and life really powerfully. ‘Relationships are trial and error’, says Charlie. The point is whether those errors can be surmounted. Our female character, on the other hand, does not believe in 'happily ever after' and is more about bottling perfect but ephemeral moments if she could. What will they conclude as they chat for a long time over wine, before she goes on a date? Ana Parvu and Damian Reyes-Fox give us brilliant, paced, get-under-your-skin performances to take us on this journey. In a humorous, original scene, the characters start mixing English with the languages of their heritage- in which they say things that are not contrary to but go even deeper than what they are saying to each other in this dialogue. Brilliant, original writing that makes sense as Charlie and his friend know each other since young and are therefore familiar with but cannot fully understand or speak each other’s ancestral languages. Technically, Play Pretend showcases brilliant simplicity- this is a less is more approach. It features an eye-catching full length shot of Charlie smoking outside his front door, and this is brought full circle in the final scene. The locations are homely, fully in tune with the script’s intimacy: Charlie’s front door, his kitchen and his living room, and the cinematography is warm. The film also features inspired use of sound at the very end, almost as the credits roll, to suggest the real conclusion to the conversation we have been witnessing between our characters. A word also on the choice of title- which creatively poses the question, what are our characters pretending? To love, or not to love? In any case, that is always the question.
- Duskman Film Review
Star rating: 5/5 Writer: Sam Winterton Director: Sam Winterton Starring: Sam Winterton, Helen Regan and Anthony Wright Duskman is a superhero film with a difference. Jim, an ordinary lad with a job he doesn’t very much enjoy and doesn’t pay well, and a music side-hustle, finds relief within his imagination- what his counsellor would describe as ‘a coping mechanism’ in the face of trauma. From the opening scene, which features a cartoon- style animation of a city sweetly reminiscent of Townsville from Powerpuff Girls, the viewer is gripped and entertained. ‘Sometimes I need the city more than it needs me’, says Duskman- Jim’s superhero alter-ego. The superhero’s love for his town and its people is a principle in every story of the genre, but in Jim’s case it is different, because he seems to need to re-assess his relationship with the place he lives, a place where, according to one of the villains, ‘bad things happen all the time’. Duskman features a brilliant cast playing really memorable characters. It’s delightful to see two really well defined and strong female characters, Jim’s friend Ellen, and his counsellor. They are the ones he seems to trust the most, who are truly present. There is a lovely scene between Jim and Ellen portraying a spontaneity that is unusual between friends in 2025. These female characters are also really well brought out by a wonderfully dynamic, rhythmical script. Duskman is written in such a way that the characters’ struggles and imagination are consistently interwoven, bringing their stories to life with a huge level of creativity. Technically this is a brilliant film, seamlessly switching between cinematic, drama genre style and the superhero genre style of shots and lighting, giving it a genuinely original voice. Added to this technical attention is the inspired choice of locations: alleyways, Jim’s unloved work office, time-worn redbrick buildings, railway bridges, walls covered in colourful, meaningful graffiti art. The contrast between this unmistakably British town setting- Leicester to be precise- and the Townsville of Jim’s imagination is attention- grabbing in a brilliant, almost comic-like way and makes this a really atmospheric film. The costume and make up departments deserve a huge shout out, especially for the superhero scenes- they are imaginative and bold and blend consistently in with the locations. A word also about the great original score. Both musically and lyrically they make real justice to the film. In today’s world, we really need humorurs, sincere and genuinely entertaining films like Duskman.
- The Weight Review
Star rating: 5/5 Writer: Marshall Malone Director: Marshall Malone Starring: Jaron Wallace, Aimee Ortiz and Jas Abramowitz ‘That’s what family does’ is the resounding phrase of this warm, giggly short comedy narrated in the ‘mockumentary’ format. Mockumentary is a brave choice of genre, having such a rich comedic heritage including The Office and This Country, but this film is beautifully done. Starring Jaron Wallace as the weighed-down protagonist, and Aimee Ortiz and Jas Abramowitz as his burdened family, The Weight is a comedy for our times exploring mental health and emotional responsibility. Family is a lot of things, above all the group of people who knows us inside out, the light and the shade, and this is brilliantly showcased in this piece which features funny, sincere performances by its whole cast. Aimee’s performance expressing uncertainty and affection in equal measure is particularly brilliant, accessible work. Internal turmoil, fear, mental health challenges, experienced by so many people but understood seemingly by very few, is explored here not in a dramatic way, but from a more ordinary, even mundane point of view: the way it erupts on the everyday, on routines, on ways of living, and the way it disrupts assumptions about the home, and shared spaced more generally, and ultimately makes us see the world differently than we otherwise might. ‘Normally I would just let it go to voicemail’ is a usual response from people to those suffering with a mental health crisis when they call. But in The Weight, a change occurs. The audience gets taken through The Problem, the Reaction, and the Solution. We see clear cinematic influence here in the use of a narrative structure reminiscent of the documentary. Technically the film is very dynamic, with great close-up and birds-eye-view shots we might see in documentaries, making it a coherent piece. The family home, including the garden, is the only location of the film, as this is a great set up in which to tell this story- we are being ‘let in’, the way documentaries let us into knowledge and experience. ‘Knowledge is your ally’, the protagonist is told by his brother. In the real world, which art and film aim to reflect, it is increasingly more evident that connection with our physical surroundings, being present in each moment, and belonging to a community are key tools to surmounting crises, of almost any kind- including emotional and psychological. Because certain situations in life turn out like a film, but some turn out like the bloopers at the end of this particular one which are a delightful addition. Hooray for heartwarming, tender films like The Weight.
Forum Posts (804)
- “YOUR MOVE” - REVIEW: Over the Edge, Into the DarknessIn Film Reviews·January 27, 2018There is an apocryphal saying - variously attributed to Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Mark Twain and a host of others - that there are only two stories we tell each other in our literature, our movies, our narrative arts. In the first, a person goes on a journey; in the second, a stranger comes to town. What matters is not which of these stories an artist chooses, but how it’s told, and how it illuminates another corner of the human soul, be it dark or light. With “Your Move” actor/director/writer Luke Goss effectively combines the two in the person of his protagonist, who must go on a journey to save what he loves most in the world, becoming a stranger in the dark underworld of a Mexican town where clues and danger are virtually indistinguishable. Goss - up to now known as an actor’s actor and platinum-selling musician - proves highly adept at this newest iteration of his abilities, guiding what in other hands might be a standard genre story forward with skill and subtlety. By keeping the focus on the inner workings of his characters Goss creates as much nerve-wracking tension with a quiet tableau between two people as he does with an all-out chase scene. Goss plays New York businessman David Miller, a man with a good life and a family he adores. While on a video call with his wife Isabel (Patricia De Leon) and young daughter Savannah (Laura Martin), who are in Mexico visiting Isabel’s parents, David - back home in New York - witnesses a brutal attack on them that ends in an apparent kidnapping. Stuck thousands of miles away and not knowing where to turn, David calls the local NYPD, whose skeptical response only makes him realize how dire his family’s situation actually is. As an actor Goss is deeply likable, exceptionally effective at translating what his characters are feeling, and the terror David experiences at not knowing what has happened to his loved ones is brutal and palpable. In Mexico he meets the cop in charge of the case, Detective Romero (the superb Robert Davi, in a richly nuanced performance). David wants answers, action, anything to make him feel that progress is being made. Romero, a good detective, understands the need to build his case on facts, and while Romero feels for David’s plight, the man is also his worst nightmare - an uncontrolled wild card who could blow the case at a moment’s notice by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Romero’s careful, low-key approach to the investigation seems like dangerous and deadly plodding from David’s point of view, sure to get his wife and daughter killed. On the other side of the coin is Isabel’s father, Señor Barrabas, a wealthy patrón of weight and gravity. Luis Gatica plays Barrabas with a quiet intensity that is at once civilized and menacing. Though he treats David and the detective as equals, he appears to engender fear and respect everywhere else. Accompanied at all times by a suited, hulking - and likely armed - bodyguard, who Goss subtley keeps just at the edge of the frame, Barrabas’ business dealings can only be guessed at. When it appears that he agrees with Romero’s method of handling the case, David panicks and takes matters into his own hands. Though fit and athletic, David has no “special set of skills” with which to make the bad guy’s life hell a’la the uber-hero in “Taken”, relying instead on instinct and sheer persistence, driven by the certain terror that if he doesn’t use every means at his disposal to track his family down, he will never see them again. Agonizing every step of the way over what he must become to get the job done, he isolates himself from both family and the authorities and relies instead on his gut. Goss’s abilities as a visual stylist and storyteller are well-matched to his subject matter and the camerawork is assured, but he doesn’t sacrifice character development for the sake of style. Goss - who also wrote the script - keeps the dialogue spare and measured, making wonderful use of the players’ inner lives to push the narrative and generate emotion. The acting is uniformly superb and the casting and directing are spot-on, with a touching and almost Fellini-esque sensibility, making scenes with even the most secondary characters satisfying and rewarding. The landscape of the human face as a map of the psyche clearly fascinates Goss at the deepest levels, and his painterly use of color, light and shadow add to the suspense and the unfolding story, while allowing the audience their own visual and emotional journey. And though the church is never explicitly mentioned there is a strain of lush religious iconography running through the film, implying religion as a particularly horrifying form of self-justification for the antagonist, played by Alain Mora in a performance that is a revelatory and disturbing portrayal of a man with a terrifying split in his psyche. The film may be billed as a psychological thriller, but the execution and performances defy simple genre categorization. It would appear that “Your Move” marks the auspicious start of yet another successful branch of Goss’s multi-hyphenate career. “Your Move” has its UK premiere on January 27, 2017. Watch the trailer, here: Writer: Kely Lyons - Los Angeles - January 27, 2018361957
- "Crazy Right" movie trailerIn Movie Trailers·March 5, 201824182
- Beauty and the Beast (2017) ReviewIn Film Reviews·November 1, 2017Disney is back with another live-action adaptation of one of their animated films. This time it was up to Beauty and the Beast to be remade and please the audience. But if we look at the final product that the film is, it seems to be that Disney did it more for the money than for the audience. Will the audience end up roaring for the new film or will it just be Disney happily roaring their victory over their audience? I think we all know the answer to that question. Beauty and the Beast is directed by Bill Condon and tells the tale of Belle. Belle (Emma Watson) is a young adult, who loves to read books and dreaming of playing a part in the adventures that are depicted on those pages. But when she leaves her small village to find her missing father (Kevin Kline), she encounters a large castle in which lives a horrifying Beast (Dan Stevens). As Belle stays with the Beast, she learns that true beauty is found within. Right from the beginning, the film wants to make very clear what kind of a jerk the Beast was before he came a Beast. Just like in the original animated film, where they spend a short monologue on the case. However, in this live-action adaptation they take more then a few minutes to make it clear that the Beast is a jerk. The problem is not that it is not well done, because making the Beast look arrogant is something the movie does is quite well, but the problem is that right from the beginning one of our main characters is an unlikeable prick, which creates a situation wherein you cannot root for the Beast to become normal again. You want him to stay a Beast, because that’s what he honestly deserves to be. He acts like a Beast for the first two acts of the movie. Then the filmmakers remembered that the Beast also must become a human at the end, so they quickly shoved moments in the movie trying to make the Beast look less like a prick and more like an misunderstood young adult. In the original animated film, the Beast had a compelling arc. In this film he does have an arc, but it’s not compelling because the Beast is arrogant throughout most of the film and acts like a prick to everyone around him. The arc is also rushed to the point that it makes you care even less for the Beast. Do you want examples of how much of a prick the Beast is? Well, the Beast doesn’t even give Belle a minute to say goodbye to her father, the Beast keeps correcting and interrupting Belle, the Beast wouldn’t give Belle a room, the Beast forces Belle to eat with him and lets her starve when she says she won’t eat with him etc. The thing with this movie is that they like to exaggerate everything the original did, to the point that this movie feels more like a dark cartoon then the original did.The scriptwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos also try to add new story elements to the script. There is a new back-story how both Belle and the Beast lost their mothers and it adds nothing new to the story. The scriptwriters probably did this trying to make the Beast, after first writing him as such an unlikable character, look more sympathetic and to give Belle an arc. Only thing is that the new back-story doesn’t make Beast look more sympathetic, he still comes across, as a bitter young adult and Belle never gets a conclusion to her arc. Her mother died when she was just a baby. Belle never knew her mother and this has had a great impact on her. However when she finally finds out, what happened to her mother, the subplot is quickly moved aside to continue the main story. Her arc is never resolved or even started to be honest. It just a waste of time. The script also tries to give Belle more personality. They did this by making her amazing in everything. She is good in reading, good with children, good in teaching, good in inventing, good in drawing, good in taming wild beasts (get it?). However, as expected, being good in everything doesn’t count as a trademark for a character. She isn’t Leonardo Da Vinci. Belle is a dreamer, who gets inspired by the books she reads. Belle is intellectual. Indeed. But in this movie they exaggerated her intelligence to the point that this Belle feels more like a cartoon character then her animated counterpart. There are also some continuity errors. Belle on Phillipe, the horse, move like the Flash when needed. Belle just arrives shortly after the villagers arrive at the castle, while the villagers had a big head start. The sound effects are also sometimes off in the final battle. Oh right, forgot. To please the immature and the children, the movie also includes butt and poop jokes. Yeah! There is also a mystery subplot for the character Agathe, which turns out to be the witch that cursed the Beast. This is so poorly done and unnecessary. She just comes and goes when the story needs her to come an go. And her importance to the story is never explained. Which leaves another unsolved subplot.The CGI in this film is, in contrary to the beautiful The Jungle Book, more creepy than fantasy provoking. Nobody wants to see a CGI teapot smiling. They created some nice nightmare related visuals for the younger kids. Can’t wait to see this on a childhood trauma list.Not everything is bad though. The acting is on point. Especially Gaston is likeable, which feels weird because he’s supposed to be villain of the film. Well don’t worry, because for this first half of the film Gaston comes across as a normal, somewhat dimwitted, individual, but in the second half, he leaves Maurice for the wolves stuck at a tree. Something the animated Gaston would probably also be able to do. The Gaston song is also very amusing. Their is actually an illiterate joke in their that works. The song also contains one exciting, maybe little expectable, but still amusing shot. In the end, Beauty and the Beast, is another Disney remake that is poorly executed and is solely done for the money. This movie in particular felt more like a cash grab than the other Disney movies. That is probably because the effect of the original is still untouched by other Disney movies. It is the only animated movie to be nominated for best picture. It is one of the most well known Disney movies. These were the reasons for which Disney thought that their live-action version could earn some big money. Sadly, it did. Overall, it’s not a complete failure. There are some genuine emotional moments. Some new interesting ideas, that all don’t workout however. And sometimes a joke works. But in the end, the movie is still pretty bad, mostly thanks to the poor script.15174
.png)











