top of page

Forum Posts

dannybarnettsmith
Mar 28, 2019
In Film Reviews
If there’s one thing that can be said about the DCEU, it’s that their release schedule is very inconsistent. There was three years between Man of Steel (2013) and Batman v Superman (2016), then over a year between Justice League (2017) and Aquaman (2018) and within five months of that film we now have this one to tide us over another eleven months until Birds of Prey (2020). The point I’m trying to make is the DC release schedule is as inconsistent as the overall tone for this cinematic universe. I personally loved the dark and moody approach they were going for in those early days, but with this and the last couple of movies, it’s clear they want to pretty much abandon the moodiness for a lighter tone akin to what Marvel usually has and by the end of this film, it’s clear they are not looking back. Shazam is without a doubt the most self-aware and child-like of the DCEU movies so far. Not in that it’s childish, but in the awe and wonder than comes from the main characters (probably because they are children/teenagers). The real joy of this film is the reminder of why superheroes and their stories are so enticing and timeless in that it presents it a simple story of hero versus villain and the joyous wish fulfilment of it all along the way. We’ve all had conversations about what kind of superpowers we would want and what we would use them for and here, kind of like Kick-Ass (2010), we get to see wonder of a young protagonist be blessed with being a superhero. Also note that both of these movies feature Mark Strong as the primary antagonist. Shazam follows a teenager named Billy Batson (Asher Angel) as he struggles to navigate life as an orphan, constantly running away to search for his lost mother. Once he is taken by foster parents (Cooper Andrews and Marta Milans), who are probably the coolest parents ever, he finds himself living with five other foster kids and attends the same school as them. While evading some bullies he finds himself transported to another realm where a dying wizard named Shazam (Djimon Hounsou) bestows him with all his powers, which transform him into an adult version of himself (Zachery Levi). He must then learn how to use these powers to battle Thaddeus Sivana (Mark Strong) who has gained some powers of his own, including the supervillain team of the seven deadly sins. The highest points of this movie are every time we get the adult Billy, played by Levi. Much like Paul Rudd as Ant-Man, Levi is best known for comedy roles and that is quite clearly where his biggest strengths lie here as he smoothly makes that transition into this kind of universe. Of course not his first experience in a superhero landscape, see the first two Thor movies (2011 and 2013) and Heroes Reborn (2015-16). Unlike those projects however, here is a given centre stage and really able to show off his talent and play up exactly how we would feel as a kid who suddenly has all these amazing abilities. Asher Angel as teenager Billy is also good in the role, able to sell us the hurt of losing his family while simultaneously learning to love and accept his new family. Speaking of which the other five kids are all great, with Jack Dylan Grazer as Freddy being the most prominent of the bunch and has good chemistry with both young and older Billy. What I found to be the weakest aspect of the movie is though, is Mark Strong’s villain. It might just be that I’ve seen him in so many villain roles and enjoyed seeing him play against type in the Kingsman franchise (2015 -), but here it seemed a little overplayed. He’s perfectly serviceable in the part and does a few good moments and gags, but ultimately he doesn’t get much to work with. This is a common problem for a lot of superhero movie villains so it’s one of those things you expect at this point. The seven deadly sins don’t do much outside of an early boardroom scene and the climax, but their designs are cool and they serve their purpose. Again this is by the far the most funny and brightly coloured of the DCEU movies. The colours on Shazam’s suit pop and the costume has a great design. This is a simple, fun origin movie with a lot of heart and effortlessly tells an engaging and relatable story about family and self-belief. The most fun and wonder comes from Billy testing what powers he has and the delight in seeing him harness them properly or the amusement in watching him discover that no, he can’t turn invisible. Not to mention we all know we’d totally use them to get back at a bully if we were back in school. Everything flows very nicely and story progression is so well paced that you’re at the start of the climax before you know it. It’s just a bit of a misstep that said climax starts maybe 30/40 minutes before the end of the movie and as a result feels like it drags a tiny bit. Despite a minor issue like that, which could’ve been ironed out with a tighter edit, Shazam is another great movie not only for DC, but for superhero movies in general. Unlike Aquaman though, it embraces the larger universe a bit more with Batman and superman cameos but not necessarily in the way you might think. Zachary Levi nails it as a teenager in an adult’s body with the ecstatic curiosity of not only what he can do with his powers, but what an adult can do too.
0
0
99
dannybarnettsmith
Aug 02, 2018
In Film Reviews
Any Marvel movie that has to follow Infinity War is unfairly going to be compared to the grandeur of that film and while Ant-Man and the Wasp was never meant to be as grand in scale or serious as that film, it just about manages to succeed in being a light-hearted, low stakes affair much like the 2015 original. Not everything here works though and I’d say that it’s the weakest MCU film this year and probably in Phase 3 so far. That doesn’t mean it’s bad, it’s just a little lacking to me. For those confused about the film’s place in the timeline, it takes place before Avengers: Infinity War (2018) and syncs up with those events come the end. The story revolves around two major plot lines, the first being that of Hope (Evangeline Lilly) and Hank’s (Michael Douglas) mission to rescue her mother/his wife from the Quantum Realm, while the second involves the threat posed by The Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen) to them and Scott Lang (Paul Rudd). While I found neither of these plot lines all that investing, it’s the chemistry between the three main leads that holds everything together. Rudd, Lilly and Douglas continue to shine as these characters. Giving Lilly the chance to suit up and become The Wasp for this film was an exciting prospect and she does great in all her action scenes, but there are times where Hope should clearly have been given more input in a scene, but sometimes Scott and Hank will steal the moment from her. Despite this, I felt the character really came more into her own here. Scott Lang continues to be the earnest and underdog hero of the MCU. For me the moments that he has with his daughter are the moments where he’s the real hero and Rudd really sells these scenes. The supporting cast of Michael Peña, Tip Harris and David Dastmalchian are usually the comedic highlights of the film, just as they were in the original, although I was disappointed we didn’t get more of Luis’ (Peña) signature stories. The weakest characters of the film though really fall of the villain side of things. John-Kamen as Ava/The Ghost doesn’t get much to do in the role and the actress doesn’t give a particularly memorable performance either. Her motivations are clear, but understandable meaning she isn’t really much of a villain in the end. This means the only straight-up villain of the film is Sonny Burch (Walton Goggins), a black market dealer and he’s too one dimensional and not very threatening either. Overall, the villains of the picture were easily the weakest of Phase 3 which is a shame because Phase 3 has had some pretty strong villains. What’s unique about Ant-Man’s world is the shrinking and growing perspective that adds an often comical and surreal experience to many scenes. The action scenes in particular inventively use the shrinking/growing aspects to create some fun set-pieces. The climax is where a lot of this used; unfortunately a lot of it is shown in the trailer. Actually a lot of this movie was shown in the trailer, including the post-credit scene. However, the technical filmmaking is an all-around improvement over the original with the direction feeling more confident and the actors more settled into their characters. It’s just the story seems to go in circles sometimes throwing off the pace. Director Peyton Reed delivered on everything audiences came to like about the original Ant-Man, but this sequel fails to always be interesting or exciting. It’s many moments of comedy don’t always work and the villains are too bland to feel menacing. It’s certainly a fun distraction while we wait for the next Avengers, but it won’t go down as one of the MCU’s best.
0
0
15
dannybarnettsmith
Aug 01, 2018
In Film Reviews
How is it possible for a franchise to just outdo itself and improve upon each new instalment? The only other one that comes close is The Fast and the Furious (2001 - ). Tom Cruise and the directors he picks for each new entry deserve massive amounts of praise for continuously blowing expectations out of the water and delivering exciting, daring moviemaking. For a sixth film to not only be this good or even the best in the franchise, but one of the bets action movies ever made is remarkable. Basically this review is going to be nothing but heaps of praise for a movie that left me wholly satisfied and engaged every one of my senses. When I first heard that Christopher McQuarrie, director of the previous instalment Rogue Nation (2015), was to return for this film I was a little concerned. The rotation of a new director is what has made each of these films so distinct and brilliant each time and with the same director returning I was worried that the enthusiasm and passion may lessen and result in something disappointing. This is what happened when Sam Mendes blew everyone away with Skyfall (2012) and then failed to reach the same heights again with Spectre (2015) for James Bond. After watching Fallout it makes perfect sense why McQuarrie returned here as it is very much a direct sequel to Rogue Nation. Having this chance to continue the story he helped craft in the previous film definitely gave McQuarrie the time to improve his craft. Just looking at this film is beautiful, from the cinematography to the directing, the tense nature of the action scenes and the story that never slows down or gets boring, everything is perfect. It goes without saying that Tom Cruise himself deserves a lot of praise too as he if the driving force behind these movies. Without his commitment, dedication and just how much he cares about this franchise, it’s possible that this franchise would have never survived past the second film with someone else involved in the lead role. By now most know just how crazy Cruise is when it comes to the stunts and how much he puts his own life in danger for our entertainment, but you can’t deny the results. In terms of acting performance, he’s rivalled here by Henry Cavill as CIA assassin, August Walker. Cruise and Cavill share much of the first hour together and the two are electric together, playing off each other with a spark that ignites in some terrifically choreographed and brutal action scenes, the bathroom fight in Paris for one. Not to discredit the rest of the cast though, Simon Pegg and Ving Rhames are in reliably good form as the comedic duo of the film, Benji and Luther. Rebecca Ferguson makes a welcome return as IIsa Faust, continuing to be the best female character of the entire franchise and Sean Harris as antagonist Solomon Lane has officially become the best villain of the franchise. Having these films be centred around Ethan Hunt and his team is what gives the films their heart and the reason the action scenes are always so exciting, because they are always character driven. The final result of Fallout is an insanely tense and often heart-pounding action thriller that draws upon aspects of every Mission: Impossible, but is something entirely unique and special. It’s an experience that I feel is missing from the cinema nowadays. As much as I love superheroes and impossible things brought to life with CGI, it’s exhilarating when a Mission Impossible film comes along and shows us all how it’s done with real stunts, real locations and very real injury. Special mention must go to the composer here who has provided the best music for the series so far, as well as the opening credits which were by far the most exciting they’ve ever been. The camera captures everything so perfectly that everything looks so crisp and clear, with action scenes that are tense, brutal and immersive. There are even emotional moments that caught me off guard that really make you realise just how far we’ve come with some of these characters. Fallout has a prefect mix of everything that makes a truly great film and one I’m afraid not enough people are going to see. The franchise really has made each film better than the last except M:I 2 (2000) and it’ll be hard to keep the quality the same from here, but if they want to try a seventh time then they should definitely go for it.
Mission: Impossible Fallout Review content media
0
0
11

dannybarnettsmith

More actions
bottom of page