Darren Tilby
Aug 19, 20202 min
★★★★
Directed by: #KubaMikurda
Written by: #MarcinKubawski, #KubaMikurda
Starring: #TerryGilliam, #LisbethHummel, #PeterBradshaw, #BertrandBonello, #MarkCousins, #NeilJordan, #NoëlVéry
Walerian Borowczyk - a writer/director of unparalleled sensuality, unequalled in the 1970s for his work on sexual freedom, but later labelled an erotic filmmaker, had a short but undeniably impactful career. By interviewing long-time collaborators, peers and fans of his work, Kuba Mikurda offers a rare insight into his art, which poses questions on society’s relationship with love and hate and the boundaries of artistic freedom, in a celebration of Borowczyk’s enigmatic and often controversial career.
Unlike Borowczyk himself, Love Express follows a fairly conventional (documentary-film) formula: it’s constructed from archive footage of Borowczyk at work and in interview, as well as contemporary interviews from those who knew him or his work. It’s a safe choice, one that works well, but still, I feel more could have been done here to differentiate it a little.
Long-time collaborator Noël Véry – who acted as a camera operator in many of Borowczyk’s films and was one of the people closest to him – leads and stays with us throughout the movie, which, at only 70-minutes in length, flows nicely and never outstayed its welcome.
As an animator – an identity which he never truly shed – manipulating and fetishising objects. To a live-action director (now manipulating and fetishising his actors as he once did his animations). To his unfortunate and eventual pigeonholing as a pornographer, Mikurda takes us through it all.
Throughout the film’s five chapters (each detailing particularly important years and movies) we hear from an eclectic mix of people, all with varying interests in Borowczyk’s work: Terry Gilliam, Bertrand Bonello, Neil Jordan, Andrzej Wajda and Patrice Leconte to name but a few.
The interviews themselves are incredibly well-conducted; informative, absorbing, well-shot and with excellent sound quality. While small, almost playful, visual flourishes serve to illustrate the voiced opinion, in addition to keeping the viewer entertained.
More importantly, the film’s entirely successful in bringing to light the unique and often misunderstood talent of one of cinema’s most infamous and enigmatic filmmakers. I knew very little about Borowczyk or his process going into this movie - having seen only a couple of his films. But by the end, I left feeling enlightened and determined. Determined to find his older works.
And in the end, isn’t that the point?